We performed a comparison between AutoSys Workload Automation and ESP Workload Automation Intelligence based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about BMC, Tidal Software by Redwood, Redwood Software and others in Workload Automation."It is a fairly stable solution."
"This solution has made my clients' workplaces a lot less labor-intensive."
"The ability to create calendars, calendering for batch jobs to run on a scheduled frequency."
"We use CA Workload Automation AE r11.3.6 to automate enterprise-wide scheduling and file transfers using an FTP plugin."
"It works constantly and is pretty seamless. You do not have to open up many support tickets."
"We get better reports than we use to have."
"We use technical support all the time. We would be lost without them. They're fantastic. Really good job. We're able to reach the right person to help us out right away."
"It has improved my organization by automating IT applications."
"The solution can scale."
"Pricing model for distributed should have an Enterprise option."
"There is a difference between a web interface and the thick client interface. We particularly like a thick client interface, and it has gone away."
"We see improvement possibilities in the processing provision of predefined evaluations or individual objects, or in the Self Service portal, which can be used by any user to monitor objects or start objects."
"The visibility and control features are somewhat limited."
"Ease of implementation for upgrades."
"An area for improvement in AutoSys Workload Automation is that it lacks advanced features or advanced built-in functionalities found in competitors, for example, an advanced workflow feature. Even the handling or notification from AutoSys Workload Automation isn't the best in the industry. Other products have very good workflow-related functionalities such as ActiveBatch that's missing in AutoSys Workload Automation, so I wish the tool had those features."
"A better graphical user interface, because we have a lot of people using the client utility, and we want to get them away from that."
"There is a slow response time by tech support. Unless, you say it's severity level one. That will give you a two hour timing window for them to call you. It doesn't really happen exactly in two hours, but they try."
"The new version is going to have more web services where you could string together various web services so that you can create a workflow across multiple web services, which I don't think is there today."
Earn 20 points
AutoSys Workload Automation is ranked 6th in Workload Automation with 79 reviews while ESP Workload Automation Intelligence is ranked 23rd in Workload Automation. AutoSys Workload Automation is rated 8.4, while ESP Workload Automation Intelligence is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of AutoSys Workload Automation writes "Helps us manage complex workloads, reduce our workload failure rates, and save us time". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ESP Workload Automation Intelligence writes "Stable, connects with everything, and has great technical support". AutoSys Workload Automation is most compared with Control-M, IBM Workload Automation, Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform, Automic Workload Automation and Tidal by Redwood, whereas ESP Workload Automation Intelligence is most compared with Control-M, Stonebranch, IBM Workload Automation and CA 7 Workload Automation Intelligence.
See our list of best Workload Automation vendors.
We monitor all Workload Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.