We performed a comparison between AWS Auto Scaling and Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature is the ability to select a minimum amount of active servers so that a new server automatically launches if one fails."
"The tool gives you the flexibility to scale up and grow. The solution is also fast to deploy."
"The tool's most valuable feature is vertical auto-scaling, which is easy to use. However, most companies now prefer horizontal scaling. I set up the health check integration to monitor CPU usage. When it reaches seventy percent, it sends me an email notification."
"It can scale."
"I like the graphs provided by the tool."
"It is a stable platform."
"It helps us to reduce the cost."
"It efficiently handles traffic, ensuring we are not running expenses and the infrastructure is strong enough to handle the load."
"Splunk ITSI helps us secure our environment by allowing us to create automatons that run when alerts are triggered."
"The modeling required to setup ITSI has been very helpful in providing us a better understanding and a logical view of our services. The modeling is flexible and can be as granular or high level as our needs dictate."
"In my opinion, Splunk IT Service Intelligence (ITSI) is better than QRadar. With the help of Splunk, we can get results."
"The glass tables are very helpful."
"The feature that stood out to me most from Splunk IT Service Intelligence (ITSI) was automated dashboarding or reporting. The solution lists the severity level of issues, and the response times."
"The flexibility to develop and consolidate many solutions into one platform is great."
"It's scalable and expands well."
"ITSI includes a feature called a glass table."
"The only area of improvement is the speed at which servers are launched. When cleaning up to six servers at a time, it can take up to 15 to 20 minutes to launch new servers."
"The product’s pricing needs improvement."
"The setup can be a bit complex in some situations."
"Flexibility in configuring the workload is missing in AWS Auto Scaling."
"AWS Auto Scaling's documentation could be better."
"The billing and cost optimization of the solution could be improved."
"We can have more auto scaling algorithms implemented in AWS Auto Scaling."
"The speed of the solution must be improved."
"Predictive analytics, in terms of preventing incidents before they occur, still needs time to mature."
"The license cost is expensive."
"The dashboard queries should be improved. More queries should be suggested in order to produce better dashboards."
"Some of our customers occasionally require the development of the connectors when there are no native connectors so that we can develop in Python or for customer slash comments as well. If they could adjust that, it would be ideal."
"The problem becomes the price, as Splunk is an expensive product."
"Integration is the most critical area to improve in Splunk IT Service Intelligence (ITSI). It wasn't a great experience because you had to do a little back and forth to integrate the solution."
"It would be good if an interface was included in the next release."
"Splunk ITSI consumes a lot of CPU resources."
More Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence) Pricing and Cost Advice →
AWS Auto Scaling is ranked 15th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 18 reviews while Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence) is ranked 12th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 30 reviews. AWS Auto Scaling is rated 8.8, while Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence) is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of AWS Auto Scaling writes "The product helps reduce costs and avoids interruptions to the customer experience". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence) writes "Helps improve our incident response time, and our mean time to resolve, but visibility is limited". AWS Auto Scaling is most compared with , whereas Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence) is most compared with ServiceNow IT Operations Management, Dynatrace, Grafana, Splunk APM and BMC TrueSight Operations Management. See our AWS Auto Scaling vs. Splunk ITSI (IT Service Intelligence) report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.