We performed a comparison between AWS IAM Identity Center and Fortinet FortiAuthenticator based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Cisco, Ping Identity and others in Single Sign-On (SSO)."The product is easy for beginners to learn and use."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is RADIUS service and the social network integration feature."
"Enables easy integration, allowing for 2FA with our VPN."
"FortiAuthenticator is a very good solution. It is all jury-based. FortiAuthenticator is very easy for anyone to understand how it works and be able to take action."
"The logs have great detail that make it easier to evaluate and control the security environment."
"The product's initial setup phase was easy. It is also easy to deploy."
"The initial setup is a valuable point on Fortinet products. Most of the time, putting the theory into practice on the devices is quite friendly and straightforward. As long as you can read English you can find your way around the solution and make it work. This is a high value point on Fortinet - the way everything is laid out in the web UI is user-friendly and quite straightforward. The UI is quite simple."
"The solution is easy to learn and makes it easy for our users to add FortiToken. It's very easy to integrate if you have other Fortinet devices."
"The most valuable features of Fortinet FortiAuthenticator are easy to configure, secure, and the application has good performance."
"In the product, two groups cannot have the same name...In general, the tool does not allow for the duplication of names."
"Integration with some other enterprise applications could be improved."
"No SMS gateway from the ISP"
"We have issues with HA (high availability). These should be addressed in future releases."
"The integration with third-party tools must be better."
"It does the job I paid for, but the graphical interface could be improved."
"The only issue I encounter is that when not using FortiAuthenticator for an extended period, it's typical to encounter some obstacles in the configuration process that you need to address."
"We would like to see Linux-based operating systems be able to integrate with FortiAuthenticator to get two-factor authentication running on them. as well. This is a shortcoming that I have faced a few times already."
"It can not use SQL to query FortiAnalyzer directly."
AWS IAM Identity Center is ranked 14th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 1 review while Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is ranked 6th in Single Sign-On (SSO) with 52 reviews. AWS IAM Identity Center is rated 9.0, while Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of AWS IAM Identity Center writes "Helps users provide or revoke accesses whenever needed". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Fortinet FortiAuthenticator writes "A reasonably priced solution that can be scaled toward different functionalities and offers flexible SMS messaging". AWS IAM Identity Center is most compared with Microsoft Entra ID, Red Hat Single Sign On and Ping Identity Platform, whereas Fortinet FortiAuthenticator is most compared with Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), Fortinet FortiNAC, Fortinet FortiToken, Cisco Duo and Microsoft Entra ID.
See our list of best Single Sign-On (SSO) vendors.
We monitor all Single Sign-On (SSO) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.