We performed a comparison between AWS Savings Plans and Cloudability based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud Cost Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The initial setup is very easy."
"The most valuable feature of AWS Savings Plans is we can discuss budgets briefly during our confirmation process since we are aware of our usual consumption patterns. Creating budgets in this regard would be beneficial, as it would allow us to consume only what we need, without including reserve instances that do not serve our purpose."
"It has already given us insight into how to optimize. So, we are now ramping up steadily its usage."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its ability to create reports and dashboards."
"The sizing recommendation will look, and say, "You are only using this at 80%," then recommend a better fit for you."
"The pricing isn't too expensive."
"We use the product to get a detailed level of transparency on the cloud strengths."
"Cloudability takes care of identifying and managing the cloud."
"One of the standout features of the solution is its groups and views functionality. The solution is highly-stable. The solution is highly-scalable. The customer support is good. They can be easily contacted. The initial setup is straightforward. It's an excellent tool, especially when dealing with multiple clouds. It streamlines the process, eliminating the need to check each cloud individually."
"It provides us visibility, then we can turn around and can give the leadership team more information, which we could not previously give them."
"The visibility of AWS Savings Plans could improve."
"In the future, it would be interesting if there could be a combination of Savings Plans and some Reserved Servers."
"Cloudability needs to focus on more cloud providers."
"They can improve the custom range of the network."
"Cloudability needs to improve on data collection from cloud sources."
"The API is not well-documented. It is not straightforward and difficult to use. This needs to be improved, as it is very difficult for our developers to develop automation around it."
"Right now, what we're doing is we are manually putting the data in it, which is something which we don't like about Cloudability."
"The dashboard needs to include more graphs per team to show what individual teams are spending in a given time period."
"There are also some limitations with the dashboards and data representation in Cloudability."
"There is always room for improvement in education and training. We are not that mature in terms of our automation. It could help us identify where we could optimize in terms of build."
AWS Savings Plans is ranked 6th in Cloud Cost Management with 2 reviews while Cloudability is ranked 5th in Cloud Cost Management with 13 reviews. AWS Savings Plans is rated 9.0, while Cloudability is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of AWS Savings Plans writes "Scales well, is easy to set up, and is designed to help companies save money". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cloudability writes "An excellent solution for dealing with multiple clouds". AWS Savings Plans is most compared with Azure Cost Management, Zesty and IBM Turbonomic, whereas Cloudability is most compared with Azure Cost Management, VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth, IBM Turbonomic, Densify and Zesty. See our AWS Savings Plans vs. Cloudability report.
See our list of best Cloud Cost Management vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Cost Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.