Azure Data Factory vs Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Microsoft Logo
8,126 views|6,366 comparisons
91% willing to recommend
Microsoft Logo
16,714 views|7,803 comparisons
94% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary
Updated on Jul 18, 2022

We performed a comparison between Azure Data Factory and Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics based on our users’ reviews in four categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.

  • Ease of Deployment: Users tell us deployment of both these solutions is very easy and straightforward.
  • Features: Azure Data Factory offers packages and data transformations that can be completed with a simple drag-and-drop process. The solution performs very well with pipeline orchestration, is very flexible, and scales easily. Users would like to see machine learning options and better integration with AWS, Oracle, and other products.

    Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics users like the major advantage provided with the easy scale out and down on-demand services; this gives tremendous control over expenditures and power. The platform is very intuitive and they have different cloud offerings. Users would like to see better native support for NoSQL, social media, and internet data.
  • Pricing: Both of these solutions are pay-as-you-go. Although some users think the pricing is fair, there are users who feel the pricing could be better.
  • Service and Support: For the most part, users of both solutions are satisfied with the level of service and response they have received.

Comparison Results: Both of these solutions are very dynamic, robust, stable, and very flexible. As they are both part of the Microsoft Azure ecosystem, they are both very popular and highly regarded. Many of our users feel Azure Data Factory is an easier solution to understand and get started with out of the box. Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics is more diverse and works better with a varied amount of different areas and industries.

To learn more, read our detailed Azure Data Factory vs. Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics Report (Updated: May 2024).
772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Q&A Highlights
Question: Which solution do you prefer: KNIME, Azure Synapse Analytics, or Azure Data Factory?
Answer: Just completing the friend's answer, yes, in the Azure Synapse workspace you can create ETL/ELT pipelines, which even facilitates the data engineer's work because in the same Synapse workspace, you have the data warehouse (Dedicated Pool), your pipelines and other miscellaneous workspace resources. For additional information, Pipelines in Azure Synapse are very similar to Azure Data Factory. I believe that the ADF is still a little more robust, but it's a matter of time.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The data mapping and the ability to systematically derive data are nice features. It worked really well for the solution we had. It is visual, and it did the transformation as we wanted.""The flexibility that Azure Data Factory offers is great.""The function of the solution is great.""On the tool itself, we've never experienced any bugs or glitches. There haven't been crashes. Stability has been good.""The solution is okay.""The workflow automation features in GitLab, particularly its low code/no code approach, are highly beneficial for accelerating development speed. This feature allows for quick creation of pipelines and offers customization options for integration needs, making it versatile for various use cases. GitLab supports a wide range of connectors, catering to a majority of integration needs. Azure Data Factory's virtual enterprise and monitoring capabilities, the visual interface of GitLab makes it user-friendly and easy to teach, facilitating adoption within teams. While the monitoring capabilities are sufficient out of the box, they may not be as comprehensive as dedicated enterprise monitoring tools. GitLab's monitoring features are manageable for production use, with the option to integrate log analytics or create custom dashboards if needed. The data flow feature in Azure Data Factory within GitLab is valuable for data transformation tasks, especially for those who may not have expertise in writing complex code. It simplifies the process of data manipulation and is particularly useful for individuals unfamiliar with Spark coding. While there could be improvements for more flexibility, overall, the data flow feature effectively accomplishes its purpose within GitLab's ecosystem.""The most valuable feature is the copy activity.""The overall performance is quite good."

More Azure Data Factory Pros →

"The most valuable features of Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics are how easy and quick it is to set up the linked services.""We've had a good experience with technical support in general.""The MPP (Massively Parallel Processing) architecture helps to make things a lot faster.""Data can be stored any way you want in the data warehouse.""It's feature-rich. It has a wide range of features.""It is a fantastic product; we are satisfied with its features and performance.""The setup is pretty simple.""It's quite quick for querying, even with large datasets, and it's scalable. It's also flexible to use, so it's easy to update and get data quickly without wasting time."

More Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics Pros →

Cons
"Some known bugs and issues with Azure Data Factory could be rectified.""The pricing model should be more transparent and available online.""Areas for improvement in Azure Data Factory include connectivity and integration. When you use integration runtime, whenever there's a failure, the backup process in Azure Data Factory takes time, so this is another area for improvement.""Azure Data Factory can improve the transformation features. You have to do a lot of transformation activities. This is something that is just not fully covered. Additionally, the integration could improve for other tools, such as Azure Data Catalog.""My only problem is the seamless connectivity with various other databases, for example, SAP.""Integration of data lineage would be a nice feature in terms of DevOps integration. It would make implementation for a company much easier. I'm not sure if that's already available or not. However, that would be a great feature to add if it isn't already there.""The Microsoft documentation is too complicated.""This solution is currently only useful for basic data movement and file extractions, which we would like to see developed to handle more complex data transformations."

More Azure Data Factory Cons →

"It's pay as you go, so you never know what your bill is going to be beforehand, and that's scary for customers. If you have someone who makes a mistake and the program's a loop that is running all night, you could receive a very expensive bill.""The initial setup process needs improvement. When you're moving to the cloud it takes a bit of time. It would be great if they could implement something that would make it faster.""The solution does not support oriented scaling in the synapse.""Unfortunately, we have had some issues with the dashboard reporting. Sometimes, the data for specific periods would just appear blank on the dashboard. To investigate this, we worked with a Microsoft incident agent and it turned out to be a result of bugs in the platform when dealing with specific types of queries in Azure Data Factory.""I am pretty sure that there are areas that need improvement but I just can think of them off the top of my head.""The platform is not flexible, and the graphical user interface needs to be improved because the interface makes it hard for the end user to use it.""This is a young product in transition to the cloud and it needs more work before it is both settled as a product and competitive in the market.""I would like my team to be able to build pipelines that integrate with the Azure Data Factory."

More Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "In terms of licensing costs, we pay somewhere around S14,000 USD per month. There are some additional costs. For example, we would have to subscribe to some additional computing and for elasticity, but they are minimal."
  • "This is a cost-effective solution."
  • "The price you pay is determined by how much you use it."
  • "Understanding the pricing model for Data Factory is quite complex."
  • "I would not say that this product is overly expensive."
  • "The licensing is a pay-as-you-go model, where you pay for what you consume."
  • "Our licensing fees are approximately 15,000 ($150 USD) per month."
  • "The licensing cost is included in the Synapse."
  • More Azure Data Factory Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The price of this solution could be improved."
  • "The pricing is okay. You can pay as you go."
  • "This solution starts at €1000.00 a month for just the basics and can go up to €300,000.00 per month for the fastest version."
  • "When we are not using this solution we can simply shut it down saving us costs, which is a nice advantage."
  • "The licensing fees for this solution are on a pay-per-use basis, and not very expensive."
  • "All of the prices are available online."
  • "Our license is very expensive"
  • "They are cost aggressive, and it integrates well with other Microsoft tools."
  • More Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Cloud Data Warehouse solutions are best for your needs.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Answers from the Community
    Prab
    GaryM - PeerSpot reviewerGaryM
    Real User

    I know you're looking for someone who's done research for you but realize that's actually something people get paid to do.



    That said, what you're asking about is a mix of quite different tools when you throw KNIME in the mix. I don't know that tool but sounds like its for specific purpose and it's not an Azure tool.   Realize there's endless ETL tools out there. I've used about 1/2 dozen in my career.   I currently use both ADF and SSIS. I only use ADF when I have to as it's overly complicated to do version management and deal with ARM templates and is very very slow in comparison to SSIS. ADF can however be a good orchestrator for running SSIS - there's an Azure/PaaS version of SSIS called SSIS-IR that can run from ADF.  Synapse Analytics pipelines which is actually ADF technology but stripped down.  And now there's Fabric Data Factory which is again ADF but even more stripped down. Fabric is also bleeding edge.

    ADF has been around for long time now.  Anything Azure is cloud based and integrates with Azure services. KNIME is not that. I advise first on understanding fundamental requirements such as, what are the skill levels of your staff with ETL?   Are you an Azure shop?   What kind of data volumes are you talking about? What sources do you need to connect to (that's a biggy because not all tools talk to all sources!) What are you trying to do - build a datamart or EDW or just copy some data from a source or ?   Do you use PowerBI?   These will help drive what kind of tool you're looking for. If you want  SAAS like as possible tool due to minimal requirements, low data volumes and low staff expertise and starting from scratch, I'd give Fabric a try especially if you want low tech and already into the Power platform.  Hope that helps

    Bob Amy - PeerSpot reviewerBob Amy
    Real User

    I believe Synapse is not an ETL tool.  ADF is one optional ETL tool for a Synapse Data warehouse.. What Are the Top ETL Tools for Azure Data Warehouse? | Integrate.io

    I'd like to step back and pose a bigger option. You see, ETL means making a copy of data you have already. Have you considered a data fabric or mesh, where the data is used where it lies now?  Consider this if your data is already used by some systems, but you need to do a more comprehensive analysis of it.

    I always want to reduce the replication of databases. The concept of build yet another database to "replace" all the others rarely works out that way.  I'd rather beef up the origination system, or use a replica than build a huge portfolio of ETL programs and an army of ops, data governance, and system support to keep them in sync. 

    Finally, if you really need an ETL tool, i.e. copies of all that data... look for existing talent in your staff. Otherwise, expect to hire some people experienced with the new tool that can advise on design and development and mentor existing staff.

    Rahul-Sahay - PeerSpot reviewerRahul-Sahay
    Real User

    A couple of questions before starting the feature comparison:  i. Are you fine with an open-source solution? ii. Any specific reason you have listed ADF? iii. Who will be using these tools and how much learning curve is involved within the team? iv. What kind of data you are dealing with? v. Is data privacy an important factor? vi. Are you looking for only a cloud-based solution or open to a hybrid solution also? vii. What is the maturity level of the team when it comes to working on the cloud ........ These are just a few of the many questions basis which we do self-assessment or measure our preparedness. Let me know if you need more insights. Happy to help!!

    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:AWS Glue and Azure Data factory for ELT best performance cloud services.
    Top Answer:Azure Data Factory is flexible, modular, and works well. In terms of cost, it is not too pricey. It offers the stability and reliability I am looking for, good scalability, and is easy to set up and… more »
    Top Answer:Azure Data Factory is a solid product offering many transformation functions; It has pre-load and post-load transformations, allowing users to apply transformations either in code by using Power… more »
    Top Answer:Amazon Redshift is very fast, has a very good response time, and is very user-friendly. The initial setup is very straightforward. This solution can merge and integrate well with many different… more »
    Top Answer:The product is easy to use, and anybody can easily migrate to advanced DB.
    Top Answer:Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics is a moderately priced solution. We pay a yearly licensing fee for the solution. If you get help from partners, it will be expensive for you.
    Ranking
    3rd
    Views
    8,126
    Comparisons
    6,366
    Reviews
    47
    Average Words per Review
    509
    Rating
    8.0
    2nd
    Views
    16,714
    Comparisons
    7,803
    Reviews
    36
    Average Words per Review
    457
    Rating
    8.0
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    Azure Synapse Analytics, Microsoft Azure SQL Data Warehouse, Microsoft Azure SQL DW, Azure SQL Data Warehouse, MS Azure Synapse Analytics
    Learn More
    Overview

    Azure Data Factory efficiently manages and integrates data from various sources, enabling seamless movement and transformation across platforms. Its valuable features include seamless integration with Azure services, handling large data volumes, flexible transformation, user-friendly interface, extensive connectors, and scalability. Users have experienced improved team performance, workflow simplification, enhanced collaboration, streamlined processes, and boosted productivity.

    Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics is an end-to-end analytics solution that successfully combines analytical services to merge big data analytics and enterprise data warehouses into a single unified platform. The solution can run intelligent distributed queries among nodes, and provides the ability to query both relational and non-relational data.

    Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics is built with these 4 components:

    1. Synapse SQL
    2. Spark
    3. Synapse Pipeline
    4. Studio

    Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics Features

    Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics has many valuable key features, including:

    • Cloud Data Service: WIth Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics you can operate services (data analytics, machine learning, data warehousing, dashboarding, etc.) in a single workspace via the cloud.

    • Structured and unstructured data: Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics supports both structured and unstructured data and allows you to manage relational and non-relational data - unlike data warehouses and lakes that tend to store them respectively.

    • Effective data storage: Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics offers next-level data storage with high availability and different tiers.

    • Responsive data engine: Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics uses Massive Parallel Processing (MPP) and is designed to handle large volumes of data and analytical workloads efficiently without any problems.

    • Several scripting languages: The solution provides language compatibility and supports different programming languages, such as Python, Java, Spark SQL, and Scala.

    • Query optimization: Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics works well to facilitate limitless concurrency and performance optimization. It also simplifies workload management.

    Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics Benefits

    Some of the benefits of using Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics include:

    • Database templates: Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics offers industry-specific database templates that make it easy to combine and shape data.

    • Better business insights: With Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics you can expand discovery of insights from all your data and apply machine learning models to all your intelligent apps.

    • Reduce project development time: Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics makes it possible to have a unified experience for developing end-to-end analytics, which reduces project development time significantly.

    • Eliminate data barriers: By using Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics, you can perform analytics on operational and business apps data without data movement.

    • Advanced security: Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics provides both advanced security and privacy features to ensure data protection.

    • Machine Learning: Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics integrates Azure Machine Learning, Azure Cognitive Services, and Power BI.

    Reviews from Real Users

    Below are some reviews and helpful feedback written by Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics users who are currently using the solution.

    PeerSpot user Jael S., who is an Information Architect at Systems Analysis & Design Engineering, comments on her experience using the product, saying that it is “Scalable, intuitive, facilitates compliance and keeps your data secure”. She also says "We also like governance. It looks at what the requirements are for the company to identify the best way to ensure compliance is met when you move to the cloud."

    Michel T., CHTO at Timp-iT, mentions that "the features most valuable are the simplicity, how easy it is to create a dashboard from different information systems."

    A Senior Teradata Consultant at a tech services company says, "Microsoft provides both the platform and the data center, so you don't have to look for a cloud vendor. It saves you from having to deal with two vendors for the same task."


    Sample Customers
    1. Adobe 2. BMW 3. Coca-Cola 4. General Electric 5. Johnson & Johnson 6. LinkedIn 7. Mastercard 8. Nestle 9. Pfizer 10. Samsung 11. Siemens 12. Toyota 13. Unilever 14. Verizon 15. Walmart 16. Accenture 17. American Express 18. AT&T 19. Bank of America 20. Cisco 21. Deloitte 22. ExxonMobil 23. Ford 24. General Motors 25. IBM 26. JPMorgan Chase 27. Microsoft (Azure Data Factory is developed by Microsoft) 28. Oracle 29. Procter & Gamble 30. Salesforce 31. Shell 32. Visa
    Toshiba, Carnival, LG Electronics, Jet.com, Adobe, 
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company34%
    Insurance Company11%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company13%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Healthcare Company7%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company19%
    Financial Services Firm13%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Comms Service Provider10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization33%
    Computer Software Company10%
    Financial Services Firm8%
    Manufacturing Company5%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise19%
    Large Enterprise52%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business18%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise69%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise53%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise41%
    Large Enterprise45%
    Buyer's Guide
    Azure Data Factory vs. Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Azure Data Factory vs. Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Azure Data Factory is ranked 3rd in Cloud Data Warehouse with 81 reviews while Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics is ranked 2nd in Cloud Data Warehouse with 86 reviews. Azure Data Factory is rated 8.0, while Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Azure Data Factory writes "The data factory agent is quite good but pricing needs to be more transparent". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics writes "No competitors provide the entire solution to one place ". Azure Data Factory is most compared with Informatica PowerCenter, Informatica Cloud Data Integration, Alteryx Designer, Snowflake and Oracle Data Integrator (ODI), whereas Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics is most compared with SAP BW4HANA, Snowflake, Oracle Autonomous Data Warehouse, Teradata and Amazon Redshift. See our Azure Data Factory vs. Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics report.

    See our list of best Cloud Data Warehouse vendors.

    We monitor all Cloud Data Warehouse reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.