We performed a comparison between Azure DNS and Google Cloud DNS based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Managed DNS solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The initial setup is easy and the solution is user-friendly"
"The most valuable feature is the ease of installation."
"The integration with other services on Azure is valuable."
"The DNS resolution is the most valuable feature."
"The tool is easy to manage and use."
"The best feature is the domain register. The other great feature is that whenever you create any resources, Azure DNS will automatically create a record for you."
"If you're running your enterprise application on Azure, it's convenient to use Azure DNS. It has native integration with other Azure solutions, and Microsoft is a globally recognized DNS provider. You also get CDN services. If you're a media company that requires on-demand data streaming, your DNS plays a vital role by working with CDN services to publish your application. It's cheaper and easier to expand your solution."
"The initial setup is straightforward and not that complex."
"The scalability is good."
"It is a scalable solution."
"The tool is well integrated. We don’t need the interface of another provider. The product helps me manage my domain and write in Google Cloud."
"Google Cloud DNS continues to evolve based on customer feedback and technological advancements."
"The initial setup process is easy."
"Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."
"The web interface to manage the solution must be made easier."
"Azure needs to add domain registration to the DNS service."
"There are some issues with the solution's performance where improvements are needed."
"The solution’s pricing could be improved."
"I would like to see more security features and protection."
"Azure DNS could improve by having more updates."
"They should include more integration with other platforms."
"The product must provide information on which DNS or application is consuming the most budget."
"The cost of using Google Cloud DNS can be relatively high compared to other options, especially considering the cloud environment."
"The UI is tricky to understand for people who have not worked with DNS records. People with little to no experience with DNS records can find it hard to understand. For example, you need to know the hallmarks to input records since they need to be matched in a specific format."
"The UX of the product is an area with certain shortcomings where improvements are required."
"It needs to provide better integration."
"The solution's price could be better."
"Migrating away from Google Cloud DNS can be difficult."
Azure DNS is ranked 2nd in Managed DNS with 31 reviews while Google Cloud DNS is ranked 6th in Managed DNS with 6 reviews. Azure DNS is rated 8.4, while Google Cloud DNS is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Azure DNS writes "Offers good performance and helps its users with disaster recovery". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Google Cloud DNS writes "Constantly improving and adapting to customer needs". Azure DNS is most compared with Amazon Route 53, Cloudflare DNS, Cisco Umbrella, Infoblox DDI and Quad9, whereas Google Cloud DNS is most compared with Quad9, Cloudflare DNS, Amazon Route 53, Cisco Umbrella and Verisign Public DNS. See our Azure DNS vs. Google Cloud DNS report.
See our list of best Managed DNS vendors.
We monitor all Managed DNS reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
