We performed a comparison between Blackberry UEM and Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, VMware, ManageEngine and others in Unified Endpoint Management (UEM)."Microsoft Endpoint Manager is not expensive overall, especially for small environments."
"We are a remote company, and the product helps us manage the global endpoints. It helps us natively manage the endpoints in the cloud from anywhere."
"The most valuable features in Microsoft Intune for me are application deployment, Defender deployment, and asset management."
"Being able to manage the devices remotely is most valuable. We can push security requirements through Microsoft Intune."
"I can see that the patch management process is much improved with the bundled patch management option available in Microsoft Intune compared to the KPI deployment required by the other deployment solutions."
"We are using the mobile feature, and we are also using MDM to lock the devices, to push restrictions, et cetera"
"The ability to wipe data from and reset devices is one of the most important and valuable features. If a device is reported stolen, we can freeze it or wipe the data from it, preventing data leakage."
"Stable product that's easy to set up compared to other MDM products."
"The solution has a lot of features, such as adding different applications and devices to one platform. This allowed us to manage many devices and applications from a single platform."
"Provides behavior-based detection which offers many benefits over signature-based detection."
"The information the dashboard provides is very clear."
"The most valuable feature of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is its machine-learning capabilities. Additionally, there is full integration with other solutions."
"They did what they said. This solution could apply to any scenario."
"It integrates well into the environment."
"The protection offered by this product is good, as is the endpoint reporting."
"The live terminal is probably the best thing ever. It gives you the access to get straight onto any machine."
"It's very stable. I've never experienced downtime for the ASM console or ASM core."
"The synchronization could be improved."
"Intune could add more Linux security features and more integration with on-prem devices. The application deployments can also be improved."
"They need to add more group policies. Intune currently does not have many group policies that you can deploy. Its reporting, which is very limited at the moment, also needs improvement. It will be great if they can add report customization. Its stability needs to be improved. Sometimes, when you register a device in Intune, it doesn't show up instantly on the engine portal on the admin side. They need to provide better support for complicated issues. They also have a long turnaround time."
"I expect Microsoft Intune to have more features in the cloud because there are two major functionalities that we need to be added. This is software metering and license management. These functionalities, for now, must be on-premise. For this purpose, we have set up a SQL Server and I hope that in near future this option will be in the cloud in Microsoft Intune."
"Intune does not provide real-time visibility."
"There's quite a lot of development that they can do within their Intune dashboard. I think there are too many lines hyperlinked to move you around. Others, in contrast, give you a simple dashboard and an intuitive administrative walkthrough."
"The reporting could be improved, as it's pretty poor compared to other products of this type."
"Additional application deployment options e.g. MSI deployment with more complex parameters or additional side-by-side files, and non-MSI deployment options."
"The solution is complicated for new users. There are a lot of buttons on the first page. It can be very confusing if you’re not aware of the terms they use. For example, a button labelled ‘edit device’ doesn't explain exactly what it does or how to use it."
"The tool needs to be improved in terms of integration and interface."
"Impact on system performance is horrible, adding a lot of delays for users."
"There's an overall lack of features."
"It is not a suitable solution if you are looking for a single product with multiple features such as DLP, encryption, rollback, etc."
"It's very time-consuming to log support issues and the people that answer the tickets aren't very knowledgeable."
"Currently, we are monitoring all USB drives and ports but we would like to improve our device control capabilities."
"If they had pulse rate detection, it would be better."
"I would like to see them include NDR (Network Detection Response)."
More Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks Pricing and Cost Advice →
Blackberry UEM doesn't meet the minimum requirements to be ranked in Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) with 1 review while Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is ranked 4th in Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP) with 80 reviews. Blackberry UEM is rated 7.0, while Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Blackberry UEM writes " An affordable solution to control BlackBerry applications but has latency issues ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks writes "Perfect correlation and XDR capabilities for network traffic plus endpoint security". Blackberry UEM is most compared with Blackberry Dynamics Apps, whereas Cortex XDR by Palo Alto Networks is most compared with Microsoft Defender for Endpoint, CrowdStrike Falcon, Darktrace, Symantec Endpoint Security and Fortinet FortiEDR.
We monitor all Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.