We performed a comparison between Boomi iPaaS and Oracle Integration Cloud Service based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The Salesforce and NetSuite Application specific “connectors” provide a layer of abstraction on top of the SOAP-based APIs to streamline integration development."
"This solution has a user-friendly interface and very good documentation with solutions that helped us in working with the tool efficiently."
"It's very user-friendly and designed to be easy to use for the end user."
"The product's initial setup phase was easy."
"It has been a stable product."
"Extremely flexible for any kind of integration between systems."
"AtomSphere Integration will suit those looking for small automation and simple integrations."
"The connection configuration part and the drag-and-drop integration module are the most valuable features for me."
"The Oracle integration tool is the most comfortable tool for using those Oracle products."
"OIC offers a number of pre-built technology and SaaS adapters for high productivity for a wide range of target systems, both in-house via agents and cloud/SaaS, via a very flexible range of interfaces."
"The most important part would be the use of connectors. The significant number of cloud connectors available for active integration is its value."
"Oracle Integration Cloud Service is a really good product and the ROI is very good with it. It lowers development time. A development cycle that may have taken a year without Oracle Integration Cloud Service can drop down to three or four months with it."
"The most valuable features of this solution are the SFTP adapters, file adapters, and risk adapters, that we use in everyday projects."
"It's easy to build an integration and make changes to it."
"I particularly like the drag-and-drop feature for designing integrations and processes."
"The most valuable features of Oracle Integration Cloud Service are the seeded integrations with many communication platforms, such as Slack and emails. It works best for the historical communication methods. Those are still prevalent with all the other clients. When we are doing the integrations, it makes it a little bit easier for us to communicate the same output over Slack, rather than sending out an email and downloading the report. The number of seeded functionalities within the Oracle Integration Cloud Service platform is better."
"There are very few string handling functions and few mathematical functions are available."
"The product's UI could be more convenient."
"Lots of enhancements are needed in the API portal so that the developers can view the definitions, try out the APIs, etc."
"There are more mature (dedicated) API management and master data management (MDM) solutions available in the market."
"They are lacking in some streaming features, and messaging features from a listener's point of view."
"The solution is complex. There's a few items and features that are hard to understand. They should work to simplify the functionality so new users don't struggle."
"The API can use some work to come up to speed with the competition but Dell has plans and is working on resolving that."
"It is a costly platform. Its pricing could be better."
"Our client was quite concerned about the cost, which is something that could be reduced."
"The support and resources were lacking — they weren't there."
"Dealing with the large file size has occasionally been a challenge."
"Oracle-based automation blueprints for the majority of the integrations would be helpful to have in a future release."
"They need to make tools framework available for implementation partners"
"It would be helpful if there were more tutorials or documentation to learn about Oracle Integration Cloud Service."
"They should provide tutorials for beginners to learn about the processes."
"While most of the adapters are available through Oracle Integration Cloud Services, they do not have a lot of features. I would like to see some enrichment in this area and for the solution to go deeper into the applications and upgrade the adapters."
More Oracle Integration Cloud Service Pricing and Cost Advice →
Boomi iPaaS is ranked 5th in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 25 reviews while Oracle Integration Cloud Service is ranked 3rd in Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) with 32 reviews. Boomi iPaaS is rated 7.8, while Oracle Integration Cloud Service is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Boomi iPaaS writes "Stable product, suitable for limited integrations and lacks flexibility ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Integration Cloud Service writes "An integration tool that is highly compatible and easy to maintain". Boomi iPaaS is most compared with Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, webMethods Integration Server, SSIS, AWS Glue and Azure Data Factory, whereas Oracle Integration Cloud Service is most compared with Oracle Data Integrator (ODI), AWS Glue, Mule Anypoint Platform, Oracle GoldenGate and Workato. See our Boomi iPaaS vs. Oracle Integration Cloud Service report.
See our list of best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.