Box vs OpenText Extended ECM comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Box Logo
Read 39 Box reviews
3,765 views|2,066 comparisons
84% willing to recommend
OpenText Logo
4,166 views|3,140 comparisons
95% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Box and OpenText Extended ECM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Content Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Box vs. OpenText Extended ECM Report (Updated: May 2024).
772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The ability to collaborate around data anywhere, anytime is the most powerful features of Box.""I like the ease of use.""It is a very user-friendly product.""Box is extremely stable, they have not been hacked or lost any data in the past seventeen years. I am very impressed with it.""Using Box for cloud storage allows us to focus on the service and maintaining infrastructure.""The interface is very good.""The solution is scalable.""You can upload your bin, upload your files quickly, and download your files quickly. It provides a lot of other alternatives."

More Box Pros →

"Being able to search is valuable. Its search is pretty powerful. We are able to search for specific text, and it points us to the document that has that text. That is pretty powerful.""OpenText Extended ECM's most valuable features include permissions and security models. I also like the tool's ability to add metadata and use it to categorize information.""Scalability is great. We can extend areas horizontally and vertically.""The integration of a document management platform with many other applications, e.g. SAP, SuccessFactors, Salesforce, SharePoint, etc.""Most of our customers are very fond of the upgraded smart user interface.""Simplicity to roll out, features available, customization options.""We use Core Share to share documents with external auditors or with vendors, and that prevents them from being able to get into the whole system. It is useful.""The tool's most valuable features are document storage, security, and compliance."

More OpenText Extended ECM Pros →

Cons
"Like all cloud platforms, there are always areas of improvement around sync to local devices.""If you want to delete something in Box, you have to do it manually, one by one. That was my recent experience. They might have a bulk delete, but I could not find that option. If you want to delete something, you have to go to each and every file and delete it.""Working on documents in real-time is sometimes faulty and could be improved.""Maturity of the enterprise security around user management.""The upload speed needs improvement.""It could be cheaper.""With OneDrive, you can continuously save your files over a Box folder. That is something I wish we could have.""I haven't really come across a case where we're not able to use it for what it is, so I don't really have anything holding us up or any customers holding us up at this point that I know of. There are always some limitations, but as a technologist, I just live with them, and there is always room for improvement, but I don't have anything quantifiable."

More Box Cons →

"There are no additional features that I would like to see. I am pretty happy with it, but their support could be a bit better.""The annotation tool needs improvement. In other tools, such as Hyland OnBase, you can easily do annotation. You can easily merge documents. You can easily compare documents, whereas with OpenText, it seems to be a challenge.""The solution needs to improve the user interface.""We are looking for new, advanced UI features. Currently, the UI does not look great.""When it comes to addressing complex use cases, three or four years ago, we ended up purchasing an additional OpenText product called AppWorks because we started to run into some limitations with the workflow that can be done in Extended ECM. It was a little limiting, so we ended up getting another product.""User interface needs improvement (at least in the version we are using, desktop client).""Pricing could be improved and the stability or the performance needs improvement, which is very important.""The architecture needs improvement, as it's complex."

More OpenText Extended ECM Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "The pricing may seem steep at first, but delve into the features and you'll soon realize it is incredible value for what you get."
  • "It is expensive per head, as you need the enterprise license to get full security and tools. So negotiate a discount!"
  • "Better sign a full year's contract to get a discount."
  • "I'm in Higher Ed, so we purchase through Internet2-Net+. I absolutely recommend going that route for Higher Ed customers."
  • "A business account has a minimum of three users. If you are more than three people in-house, go for the Enterprise version. All the external users are free of charge."
  • "Our pricing and licensing is excellent. I'd tell all Higher Ed customers to talk with Internet2 for excellent pricing and support."
  • "I believe Box is cheaper than SharePoint."
  • "They are very price competitive when pushed. Initially, they come out with a standard list price, but they are willing to be very competitive. The Box price was pretty much equal to or lower than the Citrix price, and Box has more features."
  • More Box Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The licensing is not that complex for the core products, but it becomes more complicated for some additional modules."
  • "Both Open Text ECM and IBM File share are expensive."
  • "It is a little more expensive than our previous solution, but because of the fact that it has become a rallying point for different groups to come under, it might end up paying off better in the long run by not having seven siloed solutions. Even though this one solution is a little pricey, it might eliminate other ones."
  • "The tool's pricing is confusing to the end customer."
  • "The solution is expensive."
  • "OpenText Extended ECM is an expensive solution."
  • "The product is pricey."
  • "OpenText Extended ECM's pricing and licensing are aggressive and confusing for the end customer."
  • More OpenText Extended ECM Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Enterprise Content Management solutions are best for your needs.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The solution is used for data storage and any kind of visualization.
    Top Answer:The solution is expensive when it comes to API calls.
    Top Answer:One drawback is its permissions system, which has caused issues prompting our transition to SharePoint. The reporting functionality could be improved; currently, they utilize Excel for reporting… more »
    Top Answer:We also have a module on top of the Content Server called WebReports that has been one of the things that helped us facilitate the workflow and give managers good reporting and visibility into where… more »
    Top Answer:It is a little more expensive than our previous solution, but because of the fact that it has become a rallying point for different groups to come under, it might end up paying off better in the long… more »
    Top Answer:We make iterations on it. Every year, they usually ask for some small things. Overall, they are pretty happy with it. Being the IT person here, I do think there are areas for improvement, but both for… more »
    Ranking
    Views
    3,765
    Comparisons
    2,066
    Reviews
    9
    Average Words per Review
    406
    Rating
    8.1
    Views
    4,166
    Comparisons
    3,140
    Reviews
    12
    Average Words per Review
    692
    Rating
    7.5
    Comparisons
    SharePoint logo
    Compared 24% of the time.
    Microsoft OneDrive logo
    Compared 16% of the time.
    Citrix ShareFile logo
    Compared 10% of the time.
    Office 365 logo
    Compared 6% of the time.
    Egnyte logo
    Compared 5% of the time.
    Also Known As
    OpenText Content Suite Platform, OpenText Core Share
    Learn More
    Overview

    Box is a Modern Content Management Platform for companies of all sizes and industries. The difference that Box brings is that it offers the security and controls admins need with the sharing and collaboration capabilities end users want. Box has made it easier for people to securely share ideas, collaborate and get work done faster. Today, more than 62,000 businesses, including 59% of the Fortune 500, trust Box to manage content in the cloud.

    The Box platform provides HIPAA, FINRA, FedRAMP, and many other compliances to go with granular access permissions and advanced security capabilities.

    By using Box you can sync, share, and collaborate on all types of files, anywhere, on any device - but that's just the beginning. You can choose where to store your data, to manage your own encryption keys, and set workflows to automate content-based processes. You can also assign custom metadata tags to content, watermark sensitive content, and set file retention or legal hold policies.

    Box has deep, native integrations with Microsoft Office and Outlook, Google Apps for Work, Salesforce, Netsuite, Docusign, Adobe, and many other best-of-breed solutions you may already be using.

    OpenText Extended ECM (formerly OpenText Content Suite Platform) is an enterprise content management platform that securely governs the information lifecycle by integrating with leading enterprise applications, such as SAP, Microsoft 365, Salesforce and SAP SuccessFactors. Bringing content and processes together, Extended ECM provides access to information when and where it’s needed, improves decision-making and drives operational effectiveness.

    Sample Customers
    GE, Toyota, P&G, Caterpillar, Flex, Schneider Electric, Sally Beauty, Eurostar, AstraZeneca, AirBnB, Whirlpool, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Nationwide, Aeropostale etc
    ATCO Australia, MSIG Asia, Orica, Salt River Project
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Non Tech Company25%
    University9%
    Real Estate/Law Firm9%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Educational Organization49%
    Computer Software Company7%
    Financial Services Firm5%
    Manufacturing Company4%
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company18%
    Energy/Utilities Company18%
    Manufacturing Company18%
    Financial Services Firm18%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Government13%
    Computer Software Company11%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business28%
    Midsize Enterprise18%
    Large Enterprise54%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business14%
    Midsize Enterprise53%
    Large Enterprise32%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business43%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise43%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business17%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise67%
    Buyer's Guide
    Box vs. OpenText Extended ECM
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Box vs. OpenText Extended ECM and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Box is ranked 4th in Enterprise Content Management with 39 reviews while OpenText Extended ECM is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Content Management with 18 reviews. Box is rated 8.4, while OpenText Extended ECM is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Box writes "Allows you to upload and download files quickly but lacks integration with Office 365". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Extended ECM writes "Serves as a single source of support for the company but has scalability issues". Box is most compared with SharePoint, Microsoft OneDrive, Citrix ShareFile, Office 365 and Egnyte, whereas OpenText Extended ECM is most compared with OpenText Documentum, SharePoint, IBM FileNet, Hyland OnBase and OpenText Core. See our Box vs. OpenText Extended ECM report.

    See our list of best Enterprise Content Management vendors and best Content Collaboration Platforms vendors.

    We monitor all Enterprise Content Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.