We performed a comparison between BrowserStack and LambdaTest based on our users’ reviews in four categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Comparison Results: BrowserStack slightly nudges ahead of LambdaTest in this comparison. BrowserStack offers seamless access - users can use many different devices to gain access. Integration is good and the solution updates regularly to add new device options. LambdaTest is lacking in some basic features that other solutions provide and its performance can be a bit slow.
"It just added some flexibility. There was nothing that improved our coding standards, etc. because all of our UIs were functional before we tried it."
"It is a scalable solution."
"The speed of the solution and its performance are valuable."
"The most valuable feature is that it provides parallel and cross-browser testing. It enables us to run tests on multiple browsers or devices simultaneously."
"The most valuable features are the variety of tools available."
"Local testing for products with no public exposure is an advantage in development."
"The most valuable feature of BrowserStack is the ability to do manual testing."
"The product's initial setup phase was not very difficult."
"This product offers out-of-the-box geolocation testing in automation, which is amazing!"
"LambdaTest offers geolocation testing in automation, which is amazing!"
"It's user-friendly and offers valuable features for testing, making it a reliable tool."
"LambdaTest is easy to use, and the documentation provides all the needed information."
"Our test execution time was reduced to 16 mins from five hours when executed in parallel on multiple VMs. This has been extremely helpful!"
"In case something goes wrong at LambdaTest end, the Support team is extremely responsive to analyze any platform-related issues."
"Stability-wise, I have not experienced any downtime or other performance issues."
"Geolocation testing is as straightforward as ticking checkboxes of browsers, operating systems, and countries."
"If you are inactive for 30 minutes, the solution will close."
"We are having difficulty with the payment system for the BrowserStack team, as they only accept credit cards and we are encountering some issues."
"Occasionally, there are disruptions in the connection which can interfere with our testing processes, especially when testing on phones."
"It is difficult to use for someone who has little to no experience."
"I would like to see clearer visibility."
"Connectivity can sometimes mar the testing experience."
"While I was testing I was not 100% sure a that was properly mimicking the browsers or not. We had some issues with a browser, and the reason was the browser itself does not provide any support. If the local system does not provide any support, I think this was the problem. There should be better integration with other solutions, such as JIRA."
"There is some stability issue in the product, making it in areas where improvements are required."
"Improvements on a platform need to happen on a timely basis...There should be some new features coming up or some performance improvisation over a period of time."
"Responsive testing UI is a bit cluttered, whereas the LT browser is much better to use."
"LambdaTest needs to have native application testing, which would be a great help to my team."
"Performing automation testing from UI is a little slow and could be improved."
"The scalability is good with Amazon, but IBM had some issues."
"I've also had some issues with the speed of certain API calls and the rendering of data. For example, when I'm onboarding data, the process can be slow."
"I think Lambdatest is a valuable tool for our team and things that have room for improvement would be mobile app testing, as it can be an important addition to the tool."
"Mobile application testing would be helpful for us."
BrowserStack is ranked 4th in Functional Testing Tools with 25 reviews while LambdaTest is ranked 14th in Functional Testing Tools with 21 reviews. BrowserStack is rated 8.0, while LambdaTest is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of BrowserStack writes "Good in the area of automation and offers a high test coverage to users". On the other hand, the top reviewer of LambdaTest writes "Technical support should be improved, though it has great documentation". BrowserStack is most compared with Sauce Labs, Perfecto, Tricentis Tosca, CrossBrowserTesting and Bitbar, whereas LambdaTest is most compared with Sauce Labs, Tricentis Tosca, Katalon Studio, Perfecto and Bitbar. See our BrowserStack vs. LambdaTest report.
See our list of best Functional Testing Tools vendors.
We monitor all Functional Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.