We performed a comparison between Cambium Networks Wireless WAN and Ruckus Wireless WAN based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Wireless WAN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Cambium Networks' PowerMax feature has been particularly beneficial for WAN connectivity, offering superior coverage compared to other solutions. The standout feature of Cambium Networks for me is its extensive coverage area."
"It is highly scalable. I would rate the scalability a ten out of ten."
"It eliminates the need for additional controllers, reducing costs."
"It's a good product and works well when there is a lot of interference."
"The solution's coverage range is good, it is easy to use, and deployment is very easy and user-friendly."
"The performance is very good."
"It excels in challenging environments and adverse weather conditions, maintaining high performance without any impact on the link quality."
"Technical support has been good."
"We found the technical support to be helpful."
"The connectivity is good. There's no lag at all in service."
"One of the best features of Ruckus Wireless WAN that customers are interested in is the adaptive antenna called BeamFlex. Ruckus Wireless WAN also has the best management platform, and even if there are thousands of users of the solution, it's very easy to manage on Ruckus Wireless WAN. It can also support third-party equipment. It's an all-in-one solution and it has IoT and secure access capabilities. Upgrading the network to Ruckus Wireless WAN is also easy."
"The solution can scale well."
"The feature I like most, is the product activity."
"Wireless six is the most valuable feature of this solution right now. It has supported the most recent laptop model."
"The solution is easy to use and offers good management for wireless."
"The analytic solution is good and should be improving further."
"Cambium Networks Wireless WAN could improve by providing a better signal range."
"Pricing tends to be higher than its competitors."
"There is no good technical support available for Cambium Networks Wireless WAN."
"There is room for improvement in the support."
"The modulation could be optimized for better performance, and the configuration should be made adaptive to ensure dynamic adjustments as needed."
"Cambium Networks Wireless WAN's support services could be better."
"Cambium's solution is flexible for various connectivity needs, although there are limitations based on the specific equipment and metrics. The indoor coverage typically reaches up to sixty meters and may require external antennas for optimal performance and for outdoor connectivity, Cambium Networks offer excellent scalability and coverage, especially with sectorial access points."
"Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is stable but sometimes the 2.4 gigahertz network is sometimes not as stable as the 5 gigahertz. The 5 gigahertz works smoothly with everything, but 2.4 has some problems. If we change the configuration I am not sure if it would fix the problem."
"The initial setup is complex."
"Of course, we'd always like it to be cheaper, but that's for every product."
"Ruckus Wireless WAN needs to improve its pricing."
"The support could be faster. It takes time for them to reply."
"I would like to see IoT device support available with WiFi six. IoT is used by all businesses. They are now using IoT devices. It is required."
"There is a significant issue with wireless functionality in Apple devices, particularly during video calls."
"I have been working with WiFi for more than 17 years. I am not able to convince customers because of the pricing of the solution. Otherwise, we could have sold lots of this tool to the customers."
"Pricing is an area for improvement. The devices are relatively expensive."
More Cambium Networks Wireless WAN Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is ranked 3rd in Wireless WAN with 24 reviews while Ruckus Wireless WAN is ranked 2nd in Wireless WAN with 45 reviews. Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is rated 8.6, while Ruckus Wireless WAN is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Cambium Networks Wireless WAN writes "Provides point-to-point and point-to-multipoint connectivity and user-friendly solution". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ruckus Wireless WAN writes " Offers robust outdoor connectivity, but signal strength and support need improvement". Cambium Networks Wireless WAN is most compared with Ubiquiti Wireless, Cisco Wireless WAN and Aruba Networks Wireless WAN, whereas Ruckus Wireless WAN is most compared with Ubiquiti Wireless. See our Cambium Networks Wireless WAN vs. Ruckus Wireless WAN report.
See our list of best Wireless WAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless WAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.