We performed a comparison between Camunda and KiSSFLOW based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Provides an easy way to integrate with the architectural environment."
"One valuable feature of the solution is its flexibility."
"The number of client implementations and cross-language capabilities to support multiple frameworks is very pluggable compared to Pega. It's also more portable."
"The solution is useful for small projects."
"The best feature is the automation."
"It is very user-friendly compared to IBM BPM. It's much simpler – it's more streamlined. That means even non-technical departments can use it."
"Easy to use and easy to integrate into the products and applications we provide for our customers."
"I can use any other tools to create services and the UI, and then use them together with the Camunda BPMN engine."
"The flexibility and speed in modifying and creating processes are great features. If we have a process in mind, we can usually create it within ten minutes."
"The best thing about Kissflow is its user-friendliness."
"The best thing about KiSSFLOW is that we can do virtual approvals."
"The user interface is very, very good."
"Kissflow is intuitive and easy to use, and I haven't faced any errors using the solution so far."
"The best thing is the no-code part. Even a person without experience with the coding language can easily understand and build the processes."
"The most valuable feature is the performance."
"I like the forms which help us to get information."
"Documentation can be improved."
"Especially when you use the open-source version, there are issues with performance."
"They could provide more documentation regarding the integration of different programming languages."
"Collaborations and process documentation in Camunda Platform are areas with shortcomings that need improvement."
"In the future, I would definitely like to see the process administration (migration, audit, tracking) and process evaluation (optimize) features added to the community edition."
"If Camunda could develop something that creates user forms that would be a great feature to have. They also need to improve the UI."
"We have faced problems with the performance."
"The cockpit features of the Camunda Platform can be improved to make it a bit more user-friendly, in terms of providing a bit more user experience for non-technical users. There could be some additional documentation added."
"Sometimes some notifications don't appear on the mobile app."
"KiSSFLOW needs to improve its integration."
"There is room for improvement in terms of stability."
"When there are multiple steps or if there's a disconnect when creating the ticket, it could be a problem for the user."
"The UI, though is pretty friendly and easy to use, can be improved in some aspects."
"If Kissflow can help users to be able to organize the company manuals and information, the blogs, and everything into one resource, that would be awesome."
"In future releases, it would be interesting to have a repository or portal within KiSSFLOW where users can interact with the KiSSFLOW community."
"Some of the tool's fields only accept certain types of text. The input fields are inflexible."
Camunda is ranked 1st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 71 reviews while KiSSFLOW is ranked 10th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 12 reviews. Camunda is rated 8.2, while KiSSFLOW is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of KiSSFLOW writes "The tool is intuitive to use and, through automation, has been a real time-saver". Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and Appian, whereas KiSSFLOW is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, ServiceNow, Nintex Process Platform, Appian and Bizagi. See our Camunda vs. KiSSFLOW report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
