We performed a comparison between Camunda and TIBCO iProcess Suite based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The UI is very user-friendly compared to other products. The native, vanilla UI is very interesting and intuitive to use. It's user-friendly when it comes to modernizing a business process."
"The most valuable feature is the scheduling."
"It has been a stable solution so far since it meets our needs, including data modeling, which we need to do before we embark on analyzing and optimizing the business processes."
"The product is stable."
"We have been able to save costs using this solution compared to the product we used before."
"It has an open BPM"
"The solution is useful for small projects."
"The number of client implementations and cross-language capabilities to support multiple frameworks is very pluggable compared to Pega. It's also more portable."
"It's very simple to use and the integration features between Java and other services within the workflow are very easy."
"In the future, I would like to see better transactional integrity."
"As we experienced some difficulties in the beginning, deployment took almost a month."
"The Camunda Modeler installation poses a challenge, requiring local installation, which doesn't help collaboration like other online tools, for instance."
"The user interface needs improvement. It should be more tailored to the end-user and offer a better user experience design over the user interface itself."
"We're trying to put the people from the business to do it. We are using APIs, and we have open APIs to define our APIs and the request-response that each call requires and sends. So, to base the mapping on that, there was nothing to help. I know that with some tools, such as Oracle tools, you can see the input and expected output. With drag and drop, you can take one property from the left and drag it to the right, and it does all the mapping itself, but that's not the case with Camunda. So, for me, this is something that can be improved."
"I would say that Camunda should actually focus on small cases as well. There's a lot of space out there, for small businesses. If they can, they should cater to them."
"I would like to have a feature for audit logging, audit logs and audit log management. And some history of use for the audit logs."
"Lacking in forms visualization."
"Our customers and developers have complained that the UI is a little bit confusing."
Earn 20 points
Camunda is ranked 1st in Business Process Management (BPM) with 71 reviews while TIBCO iProcess Suite is ranked 40th in Business Process Management (BPM). Camunda is rated 8.2, while TIBCO iProcess Suite is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Camunda writes "Open-source, easy to define new processes, and easy to transition to new business process definitions". On the other hand, the top reviewer of TIBCO iProcess Suite writes "An easy-to-use solution with great integration". Camunda is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Pega BPM, IBM BPM and Appian, whereas TIBCO iProcess Suite is most compared with Apache Airflow, TIBCO ActiveMatrix BPM and Pega BPM. See our Camunda vs. TIBCO iProcess Suite report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
