We performed a comparison between Cassandra and Oracle NoSQL based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about MongoDB, Couchbase, InfluxData and others in NoSQL Databases."Can achieve continuous data without a single downtime because of node to node ring architecture."
"I am satisfied with the performance."
"The time series data was one of the best features along with auto publishing."
"We can add almost one million columns to the solution."
"The most valuable features of Cassandra are the NoSQL database, high performance, and zero-copy streaming."
"A consistent solution."
"Cassandra is good. It's better than CouchDB, and we are using it in parallel with CouchDB. Cassandra looks better and is more user-friendly."
"The most valuable feature of Cassandra is its fast retrieval. Additionally, the solution can handle large amounts of data. It is the quickest application we use."
"The product meets expectations when it comes to stability."
"NoSQL has high availability. I think it's perfect from a technical perspective. It's quick to run and go."
"The tool is easy to learn."
"The tool performs well."
"The secondary index in Cassandra was a bit problematic and could be improved."
"Fine-tuning was a bit of a challenge."
"The solution doesn't have joins between tables so you need other tools for that."
"Doesn't support a solution that can give aggregation."
"The solution is limited to a linear performance."
"There could be more integration, and it could be more user-friendly."
"Maybe they can improve their performance in data fetching from a high volume of data sets."
"Interface is not user friendly."
"The licensing model is bad."
"Handling big data in a user-friendly way is currently a bit of an issue. The dashboard for this needs some work."
"The installation is difficult."
"Oracle could improve how NoSQL works in containers. I don't think NoSQL needs any new features, but I want to see new features in the Oracle Cloud Infrastructure. I would like to see some improvements in OCI's building options."
Cassandra is ranked 4th in NoSQL Databases with 19 reviews while Oracle NoSQL is ranked 8th in NoSQL Databases with 7 reviews. Cassandra is rated 8.0, while Oracle NoSQL is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Cassandra writes "Well-equipped to handle a massive influx of data and billions of requests". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle NoSQL writes "The implementation is simple and only takes 15 to 30 minutes". Cassandra is most compared with Couchbase, MongoDB, ScyllaDB, InfluxDB and Chroma, whereas Oracle NoSQL is most compared with MongoDB, ScyllaDB, InfluxDB and Aerospike Database 7.
See our list of best NoSQL Databases vendors.
We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.