We performed a comparison between Cavisson NetDiagnostics and Dynatrace based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Datadog, Dynatrace, New Relic and others in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability."Its end-to-end dashboard provides information on all the integration callouts happening on the server side."
"Daily metrics which us analyze the page composition and the corresponding performance metrics so we can quickly and easily determine when something has changed, to aid in root cause analysis."
"Capability to troubleshoot isolated customer complaints with the user session feature."
"Stability has been very nice, and Dynatrace runs on the Linux system."
"PurePath gives a lot of flexibility in identifying issues and finding the flow of execution."
"Dynatrace helped us with root cause analysis of poor performing components of our applications."
"We spend less time on troubleshooting issues since Dynatrace proactively informs us of an impending bottle neck."
"The primary use case is to monitor all our applications. We want a single place where we can monitor all our applications that we are building. Therefore, if something goes wrong, we immediately can find out what went wrong."
"It reduces time and provides detailed info, showing problem correlation, and a single point of diagnosis."
"They can improve on providing "help and navigation" for each feature available in the UI."
"More integrations could prove very beneficial to us."
"They need a capability similar to Tealeaf where you can actually view what the consumer is doing and record the sessions. That is the biggest missing element."
"They could have a better user interface, better automation, better support for cloud-based, and SaaS applications."
"Either use less system resources and be faster or use more resources to pre-compute the PurePath on recent X minutes of data"
"This tool had a feature of doing load test in production or lower environment, which was shut down earlier this year. We are missing that feature badly and we definitely want to see that feature back."
"It could improve its GUI interface. The GUI design is too crowded and the icons are small. Sometimes I end up clicking on the wrong button."
"The Web UI can be slow and hard to understand."
"They should include more mission learning into the product and provide additional performance metrics for application learning."
Earn 20 points
Cavisson NetDiagnostics is ranked 87th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability while Dynatrace is ranked 2nd in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 342 reviews. Cavisson NetDiagnostics is rated 10.0, while Dynatrace is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Cavisson NetDiagnostics writes "Improves our application at the code level because of its different performance metrics". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Dynatrace writes "AI identifies all the components of a response-time issue or failure, hugely benefiting our triage efforts". Cavisson NetDiagnostics is most compared with , whereas Dynatrace is most compared with Datadog, New Relic, AppDynamics, Splunk Enterprise Security and Azure Monitor.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
