We performed a comparison between Check Point CloudGuard WAF and Checkmarx One based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Security Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Its main value and what we liked the most is its powerful AI."
"They offer free trials, which is quite appreciative and grabs more attention from new users and businesses."
"It offers good functionality of the application that is currently running."
"The tool helps us to block IPs and applications."
"By using a cloud application security solution, our company can save costs by reducing the need for additional security hardware and software and improving operational efficiency."
"After integrating AppSec with other applications, team members can easily work without fear of confidential information exposure."
"The solution offers continuous security monitoring and alerting, which can help organizations detect and respond to security incidents in real time."
"Its ability to adapt to our applications and ensure our security policies are followed is a big plus."
"The identification of verification-related security vulnerabilities is really important and one of the key things. It also identifies vulnerabilities for any kind of third-party tool coming into the system or any third-party tools that you are using, which is very useful for avoiding random hacking."
"Helps us check vulnerabilities in our SAP Fiori application."
"Checkmarx pinpoints the vulnerability in the code and also presents the flow of malicious input across the application."
"The administration in Checkmarx is very good."
"The main benefit to using this solution is that we find vulnerabilities in our software before the development cycle is complete."
"We use the solution for dynamic application testing."
"The value you can get out of the speedy production may be worth the price tag."
"The process of remediating software security vulnerabilities can now be performed (ongoing) as portions of the application are being built in advance of being compiled."
"We would like the solution to be more economical since it is not accessible to all clients."
"You need to know exactly the system. You cannot have someone running the system if they don't have the knowledge to do so."
"There are occasions when it interfaces with other systems, leading to a loss of visibility."
"We would like to have a solution of this type for the administration of applications from mobile devices."
"They should improve in the delivery of more detailed reports with more information."
"One of the big problems we found in Check Point, in general, is the support."
"The trial version should be extended further so that QA test engineers can actually test the utilities in a real sense and can provide the maximum amount of feedback for enhancements."
"It doesn't detect user activity like some of its competitors. It's not a vulnerability, but it's a legitimate activity that it doesn't detect. It only detects vulnerabilities or misconfigurations."
"We want to have a holistic view of the portfolio-level dashboard and not just an individual technical project level."
"Its user interface could be improved and made more friendly."
"I expect application security vendors to cover all aspects of application security, including SAST, DAST, and even mobile application security testing. And it would be much better if they provided an on-premises and cloud option for all these main application security features."
"Checkmarx reports many false positives that we need to manually segregate and mark “Not exploitable”."
"I think the CxAudit tool has room for improvement. At the beginning you can choose a scan of a project, but in any event the project must be scanned again (wasting time)."
"The statistics module has a function that allows you to show some statistics, but I think it's limited. Maybe it needs more information."
"Meta data is always needed."
"The resolutions should also be provided. For example, if the user faces any problem regarding an installation due to the internal security policies of their company, there should be a resolution offered."
Check Point CloudGuard WAF is ranked 11th in Application Security Tools with 30 reviews while Checkmarx One is ranked 3rd in Application Security Tools with 67 reviews. Check Point CloudGuard WAF is rated 9.0, while Checkmarx One is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Check Point CloudGuard WAF writes "Automation capabilities also help streamline security processes and smooths down API integration processes and detects API availability". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Checkmarx One writes "The report function is a great, configurable asset but sometimes yields false positives". Check Point CloudGuard WAF is most compared with SonarQube, whereas Checkmarx One is most compared with SonarQube, Veracode, Fortify on Demand, Snyk and Coverity. See our Check Point CloudGuard WAF vs. Checkmarx One report.
See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors.
We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.