Check Point Security Management vs Graylog comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Check Point Software Technologies Logo
2,116 views|1,055 comparisons
98% willing to recommend
Graylog Logo
10,115 views|8,549 comparisons
94% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary
Updated on Jul 23, 2023

We compared Check Point Security Management and Graylog based on our users' reviews in five categories. We reviewed all of the data and you can find the conclusion below.

  • Features: Check Point Security Management is praised for its centralized management features, user-friendly interface, and extensive monitoring capabilities. Graylog stands out with its exceptional search functions, seamless integration with Elasticsearch, and real-time data access. Check Point Security Management could improve by simplifying the migration of security policies, optimizing performance, and expanding its management API. Other pain points include threat tracking and documentation. Graylog could benefit from additional customization options and an improved rule-creation process.

  • Service and Support: Check Point Security Management's customer service is widely praised for being knowledgeable, supportive, and reliable. Although some users had problems with inexperienced agents and coordination issues, the overall support experience is positive. Graylog's customer service is generally well-regarded, with reviewers noting effective solutions and satisfactory experiences. While response times may differ, Graylog's support is considered superior compared to that of other products.

  • Ease of Deployment: Check Point Security Management is generally seen as easy to set up if the user has some expertise. Some Graylog users said the setup was easy. Other reviewers faced challenges, but these were easily resolved with help from the vendor’s support staff. Graylog is easier to set up in smaller environments, but it could get complicated in large clusters.

  • Pricing: Check Point Security Management is seen as a solid investment, offering flexibility and a good value for the price. Graylog offers an enterprise edition and an open-source option with a daily capacity restriction. Some users said that data costs can be expensive.

  • ROI: Check Point users said the solution offers a steady ROI over time. Graylog can offer some cost savings. The precise ROI may vary depending on the organization’s size and use case.

Conclusion: Based on user reviews, Check Point Security Management is highly recommended over Graylog. Users appreciate its extensive range of security blades, automatic updates, centralized access and management, real-time monitoring, and integration capabilities. It also provides a positive return on investment and excellent customer service. In contrast, Graylog is criticized for its more complex initial setup, limited customization options, and concerns about infrastructure cost and authentication features. Despite being free and open-source, Graylog is considered to have less advanced and capable security features compared to Check Point Security Management.
To learn more, read our detailed Check Point Security Management vs. Graylog Report (Updated: April 2024).
772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"Mobile access has helped us cater to more than 4000 users so that they can work from home.""The additional features offered by the solution are excellent. We didn't have a lot fo these on a previous solution, and they've proven to be an advantage for us.""The features we like and find the most valuable are the ways we can manage the policy, create objects, and drag and drop objects in our daily operation. It makes our daily operation on the firewall management much easier than going, for example, to one firewall, then going to the other.""The solution is easy to use and comes with few vulnerabilities. You don't have to worry about release upgrades. Life cycle management is very easy.""Check Point Security Management has a great feature that allows you to automate the request of the automated server.""The SSL VPN monitoring based on users and tunnel monitoring are great value-added features present in the management console.""The unique management using Smart Console for all firewalls is very useful.""The intuitive interface also allows new team members to adapt to the technology if they are not familiar with it initially. It doesn't take much for one to familiarize themselves with the product."

More Check Point Security Management Pros →

"Message forwarding through the in-built module.""One of the most valuable features is that you are able to do a very detailed search through the log messages in the overview.""What I like about Graylog is that it's real-time and you have access to the raw data. So, you ingest it, and you have access to every message and every data item you ingest. You can then build analytics on top of that. You can look at the raw data, and you can do some volumetric estimations, such as how big traffic you have, how many messages of data of a type you have, etc.""Real-time UDP/GELF logging and full text-based searching.""This had increased productivity for the dev and support teams, because we are directly notifying them.""UDP is a fast and lightweight protocol, perfect for sending large volumes of logs with minimal overhead.""Storing logs in Elasticsearch means log retrieval is extremely fast, and full text search is available by default.""I like the correlation and the alerting."

More Graylog Pros →

Cons
"The migration from R77 Manager to R80 is a major upgrade. It's not very easy to do. There should be some kind of Wizard for a direct upgrade from the R77 to the R80. There should be an easy way for the customers to do the upgrade.""The graphical interface is nice but it is a bit heavy.""Even though the platform is simple, and creating security policies is a fairly quick task, creating a bulk of policies at once (ie. for a migration) could be a useful tool. This is probably possible through scripting, however, having an easy-to-use "import CSV" button would be beneficial.""If the SmartView monitor can be integrated in the R80.40 and R81 versions, that would be ideal in understanding the trends and graphs of how traffic is observed hitting the different Check Point Firewall Gateways that the Security Management controls.""It would be helpful if the documentation and good practice guides are updated. Many are still from R77.""Check Point Security Management lacks some of the competitor features.""I would like for users to have more control over the platform in the next release. Right now, the system is very central and general requiring new rules to be created that better-suite our requirements.""The upgrade procedure already made huge improvements, yet it remains more challenging compared to other products."

More Check Point Security Management Cons →

"Graylog can improve the index rotation as it's quite a complex solution.""Graylog could improve the process of creating rules. We have to create them manually by doing parses and applying them. Other SIEM solutions have basic rules and you can create and get more events of interest.""Its scalability gets complicated when we have to update or edit multiple nodes.""We ran into problems with Elasticsearch throwing a circuit-breaking exception due to field data size being too large. It turned out that the heap size directly impacted this size in a high-throughput environment, causing unexplained instability in Graylog. We were able to troubleshoot on the Elasticsearch size, but we should have been able to reference some minimum requirements for Graylog to know that our settings weren't sufficient.""It would be great if Graylog could provide a better Python package in order to make it easier to use for the Python community.""The biggest problem is the collector application, as we wanted to avoid using Graylog Collector Sidecar due to its architecture.""Over six months, I had two similar issues where searches were performed on field "messages". It exhausted all the memory of the ES node causing an ES crash and a Graylog halt.""Dashboards, stream alerts and parsing could be improved."

More Graylog Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "Do the homework because Check Point is rather expensive."
  • "This product can be used for 25 security gateways on a basic license."
  • "Check Point is much cheaper than the competition ($4/server as compared to $17/server)."
  • "The solution is expensive and there is an annual license."
  • "Price-wise, it is an expensive solution."
  • "The solution is expensive."
  • "The pricing can be estimated around 3 or 4 out of 10 in terms of expense."
  • More Check Point Security Management Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "Having paid official support is wise for projects."
  • "I am using a community edition. I have not looked at the enterprise offering from Graylog."
  • "If you want something that works and do not have the money for Splunk or QRadar, take Graylog.​​"
  • "​You get a lot out-of-the-box with the non-enterprise version, so give it a try first."
  • "Consider Enterprise support if you have atypical needs or setup requirements.​"
  • "I use the free version of Graylog."
  • "It's an open-source solution that can be used free of charge."
  • "We're using the Community edition."
  • More Graylog Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.
    772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The most beneficial features for us are the alert classifications, which help us prioritize critical issues, and the detailed reports that provide insights into attack origins and purposes, such as… more »
    Top Answer:Check Point EDR has room for improvement, especially in the area of Data Loss Prevention where it currently lacks functionality. I'd also like to see enhancements in content filtering and… more »
    Top Answer:We utilize Check Point Security Management for our daily security operations, including managing firewall rules, reviewing alerts, and generating reports on a weekly basis.
    Top Answer:The product is scalable. The solution is stable.
    Top Answer:We are using the free version of the product. However, the paid version is expensive.
    Top Answer:Since it's a free tool, I don't have much to say. Troubleshooting is important to me. The initial setup is complex. I hope to see improvements in Graylog for more interactivity, user-friendliness, and… more »
    Ranking
    10th
    out of 95 in Log Management
    Views
    2,116
    Comparisons
    1,055
    Reviews
    23
    Average Words per Review
    491
    Rating
    8.9
    11th
    out of 95 in Log Management
    Views
    10,115
    Comparisons
    8,549
    Reviews
    6
    Average Words per Review
    802
    Rating
    7.3
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    R80.10, R80, R77.30, R77, Check Point R80.10 Security Management, R80 Security Management
    Graylog2
    Learn More
    Overview

    Check Point Security Management is an advanced security management platform for enterprises. The platform integrates all aspects of security. A single platform manages the entire infrastructure, from data centers to private/public cloud deployments.

    Check Point Security Management is a reliable and easy-to-use security platform. It integrates all aspects of your security environment to strengthen the security posture without impairing productivity. The system has a layered policy model. This means the security policy can be separated into layers for network segmentation. Different administrators can manage different policies. The policy layer automates the tasks.

    The platform is extensible, scalable, and integrates easily with orchestration systems and change management.

    Basic Components of the Infrastructure

    1. Smart Console: The Check Point Graphical User Interface for connecting and managing Security Management Servers. The smart console provides an integrated solution via the following features:


    • Security policy management
    • System health monitoring
    • Multi-domain management


    The smart console offers several advantages. Changes in security policies and logs can be done with a click. You can navigate from an item within a log to the policy. There are also built-in multi-language support and accessibility features.

    1. Security Management Server: The server manages security gateways with set security policies and monitors security events on the network.

      The automation server is an integrated part of the management server. The API server is active by default on servers with 4 GB of RAM or more and on standalone servers with 8 or more GB of RAM.

      The automation server communicates with the management server the same way as the Smart Console. This architecture allows the same validation errors and warnings to be presented when using an automation session.

      The same audit logs generated using the Smart Console are also generated using an automation session. If you have a multi-domain environment, there is only one automation server that monitors all the IP addresses of the multi-domain management server.

      2. Security Gateway is placed at the edge of the network. It monitors and filters traffic and enforces security policies.

        Logging, Event management, and Monitoring

        With Check Point Security Management, logging, reporting, event management, and monitoring are integrated. The platform features widgets and chart templates that optimize visibility. One of the best features is the one-click exploration. This simplifies going from a general overview to specific event details.

        Benefits of Check Point Security Management

        • The platform keeps pace with dynamic network changes
        • Helps align security with business goals
        • Helps with threat prevention.
        • Reduces operational costs

        The unified console also means a single policy for users, data, applications, and networks. The granularity control helps accelerate administration processes. This feature, together with automation, is key to achieving reduced operational overhead. Security teams can automate tasks and even create self-service security web portals with the Check Point Security Management platform.

        Threat management is fully integrated, with reporting, logging, and monitoring all in one dashboard. This provides full visibility into the security of the network.

        Security Management Suite

        The Security Management Suite consists of the following modules:

        • Policy Management: Includes central management of different security policies across multiple domains and browser-based security management.
        • Operations Management: Includes compliance, provisioning, workflow automation, and user directory centralization.
        • Threat Management: Includes centralizing security event correlation for enforcement points. Centrally monitors Check Point devices.

        Reviews from Real Users

        A Network Security Engineer/Architect at a tech services company says, "The features we like and find the most valuable are the ways we can manage the policy, create objects, and drag and drop objects in our daily operation. It makes our daily operation on the firewall management much easier than going, for example, to one firewall, then going to the other."

        "The management API is the best new feature for me. It allows us to further automate our customers' automated server ordering," says a System Engineer Network & Security at OTTO GmbH & Co KG.

        A Senior Infrastructure Services Specialist at St.George Bank Limited adds that "The solution is ideal for use and deployment in a large infrastructure environment."





        Graylog is purpose-built to deliver the best log collection, storage, enrichment, and analysis. Graylog is:

        • Considerably faster analysis speeds.
        • More robust and easier-to-use analysis platform.
        • Simpler administration and infrastructure management.
        • Lower cost than alternatives.
        • Full-scale customer service.
        • No expensive training or tool experts required.
        Sample Customers
        Hedgetec, Geiger
        Blue Cross Blue Shield, eBay, Cisco, LinkedIn, SAP, King.com, Twilio, Deutsche Presse-Agentur
        Top Industries
        REVIEWERS
        Manufacturing Company19%
        Security Firm16%
        Financial Services Firm14%
        Computer Software Company10%
        VISITORS READING REVIEWS
        Computer Software Company13%
        Security Firm12%
        Comms Service Provider8%
        Government8%
        VISITORS READING REVIEWS
        Computer Software Company16%
        Comms Service Provider10%
        Government8%
        Educational Organization7%
        Company Size
        REVIEWERS
        Small Business34%
        Midsize Enterprise28%
        Large Enterprise38%
        VISITORS READING REVIEWS
        Small Business37%
        Midsize Enterprise15%
        Large Enterprise48%
        REVIEWERS
        Small Business50%
        Midsize Enterprise7%
        Large Enterprise43%
        VISITORS READING REVIEWS
        Small Business33%
        Midsize Enterprise18%
        Large Enterprise49%
        Buyer's Guide
        Check Point Security Management vs. Graylog
        April 2024
        Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point Security Management vs. Graylog and other solutions. Updated: April 2024.
        772,679 professionals have used our research since 2012.

        Check Point Security Management is ranked 10th in Log Management with 56 reviews while Graylog is ranked 11th in Log Management with 18 reviews. Check Point Security Management is rated 8.8, while Graylog is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Check Point Security Management writes "Great DDoS protection, high availability, and useful firewall rule implementation". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Graylog writes "Great detailed search features and easy Java integration, but needs improvement in integration with Python". Check Point Security Management is most compared with Wazuh, Fortinet FortiAnalyzer, IBM Security QRadar, LogRhythm SIEM and Datadog, whereas Graylog is most compared with Grafana Loki, Wazuh, syslog-ng, Fortinet FortiAnalyzer and Splunk Enterprise Security. See our Check Point Security Management vs. Graylog report.

        See our list of best Log Management vendors.

        We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.