We performed a comparison between Checkmarx One and Microsoft Azure Application Gateway based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Sonar, Veracode, Checkmarx and others in Application Security Tools."The reports are very good because they include details on the code level, and make suggestions about how to fix the problems."
"The value you can get out of the speedy production may be worth the price tag."
"It gives the proper code flow of vulnerabilities and the number of occurrences."
"One of the most valuable features is it is flexible."
"The SAST component was absolutely 100% stable."
"It shows in-depth code of where actual vulnerabilities are."
"Most valuable features include: ease of use, dashboard. interface and the ability to report."
"It is a stable product."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is traffic management."
"The solution is easy to set up."
"The tool helps manage microservices by providing developers with a platform to conduct tests and assessments on the web application. The custom domain option is one of the most valuable features I've found. This feature is incredibly helpful for the end-users of the web application. With the custom domain feature, you can change the lengthy link to a shorter, more memorable one. For example, instead of using a lengthy default link, you can customize it to something like imail.com, which is much easier to remember and share."
"It has a filter available, although we are not currently using it because it is not part of our requirements. But it is a good option and when it becomes part of our requirements we will definitely use it."
"The solution's most valuable feature is an HTTP solution and SSL certificate. It is also easy to use."
"It is a scalable solution...The installation phase of Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is very easy."
"I like the tool's stability and performance."
"The solution was very easy to configure. It wasn't hard at all to adjust it to our needs."
"Checkmarx needs to be more scalable for large enterprise companies."
"I would like to see the DAST solution in the future."
"With Checkmarx, normally you need to use one tool for quality and you need to use another tool for security. I understand that Checkmarx is not in the parity space because it's totally different, but they could include some free features or recommendations too."
"The solution's user interface could be improved because it seems outdated."
"C, C++, VB and T-SQL are not supported by this product. Although, C and C++ were advertised as being supported."
"The cost per user is high and should be reduced."
"Checkmarx needs to improve the false positives and provide more accuracy in identifying vulnerabilities. It misses important vulnerabilities."
"Checkmarx could improve the speed of the scans."
"The monitoring on the solution could be better."
"The increased security that we are considering is because of some of the things that the security team has brought to our attention. They have pointed out that we would most likely require a better web application firewall than Azure Application Gateway."
"The solution could improve by increasing the performance when doing updates. For example, if I change the certificate it can take 30 minutes. Other vendors do not have this type of problem."
"The pricing of the solution could be improved. Right now, it's a bit expensive."
"The pricing of the solution is a bit high. The solution should offer different pricing systems."
"Needs easier integration with the existing SIAM."
"The product could be easier to use and implement."
"One of the challenges we faced was the solution does not support any other PCP protocols apart from HTTP and HTTPS."
More Microsoft Azure Application Gateway Pricing and Cost Advice →
Checkmarx One is ranked 3rd in Application Security Tools with 67 reviews while Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is ranked 4th in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) with 41 reviews. Checkmarx One is rated 7.6, while Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is rated 7.2. The top reviewer of Checkmarx One writes "The report function is a great, configurable asset but sometimes yields false positives". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Microsoft Azure Application Gateway writes "High stability with built-in rules that reduce alerts and are easy to configure". Checkmarx One is most compared with SonarQube, Veracode, Fortify on Demand, Snyk and Coverity, whereas Microsoft Azure Application Gateway is most compared with F5 Advanced WAF, Citrix NetScaler, AWS WAF, Cloudflare Web Application Firewall and Azure Front Door.
We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
