We performed a comparison between Cisco SD-WAN and Nuage Networks based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco, Fortinet, Check Point Software Technologies and others in Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions."It has a very good GUI."
"The centralized management is the most important feature. We can monitor what is going on at every location in our network with just one center."
"You get security, all of the service you need, and it's easy to deploy."
"There is minimum blind space in this solution."
"It is very simple to deploy. It's a point-and-click type of deployment, so it's fairly simple."
"There have been no issues with stability."
"The solution sufficiently provides ISPs."
"The most useful feature is centralized telephony."
"It is stable and reliable."
"It has good reporting and analytics, that most people can understand without too much difficulty."
"One of the most valuable features of this solution is network management. The customer is able to manage their network from home or we can also manage the whole customer network."
"We had some issues with Cisco SD-WAN but somehow we troubleshot it and things are going well. The issues have not been a large problem."
"The user interface needs improvement. Users should be able to find various features faster without much tweaking."
"Cyber security should also be implemented in the solution, along with maybe implementation of AI/ML."
"Customers require features that are secure for endpoints, on-premises, and for the cloud."
"The security features could be improved."
"I would like them to add some more SD-WAN ports. We have seen one implementation where there were four ISPs. Currently, we have a maximum of two ports for ISP in this device. Therefore, we cannot connect directly, and we need other switches. There should be some option to have more than two ports for SD-WAN."
"Some competitors are much faster in providing out-of-the-box solutions, more innovative solutions. In terms of innovation, in many cases, they're lagging behind."
"The user interface needs to be more friendly."
"Security is an area that could use some work."
"The setup can be complex."
Cisco SD-WAN is ranked 1st in Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions with 86 reviews while Nuage Networks is ranked 19th in Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions with 4 reviews. Cisco SD-WAN is rated 8.0, while Nuage Networks is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Cisco SD-WAN writes "A solution for integrating services to enhance up-time, performance and lower costs". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Nuage Networks writes "Easy to use features, good support, and has the ability to maintain a session when you lose an uplink". Cisco SD-WAN is most compared with Fortinet FortiGate, Meraki SD-WAN, VMware SD-WAN, Juniper Session Smart Router and Mist WAN Assurance, whereas Nuage Networks is most compared with Cisco ACI, VMware NSX, Fortinet FortiGate and VMware SD-WAN.
See our list of best Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions vendors and best WAN Edge vendors.
We monitor all Software Defined WAN (SD-WAN) Solutions reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.