We performed a comparison between Cisco Secure Network Analytics and Trellix Network Detection and Response based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Network Detection and Response (NDR) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Using the Cognitive Analytics feature, we have complete visibility that we didn’t have before."
"The solution's analytics and thrust detection capabilities are good. We're still adjusting it. It's a little hypersensitive, but it is working right now."
"I value the feature which enables me to detect devices talking to suspect IPs."
"The most valuable feature is anomaly detection, where it finds things that are not allowed internally."
"Stealthwatch has greatly improved our network visibility, in terms of bandwidth, malware, and PCI violations."
"The beginning of any security investigation starts with net flow data."
"The fact that it can identify down to an IP address of a system that is causing problems, or potentially causing problems, is very valuable."
"The most valuable feature of Cisco Secure Network Analytics is the Threat Intelligence integration."
"Support is very helpful and responsive."
"I also like its logging method. Its logging is very powerful and useful for forensic purposes. You can see the traffic or a specific activity or how something entered your network and where it went."
"The product is very easy to configure."
"Improved our systems and our customers' by providing better malware protection, defense against zero-day threats, and improved network security."
"The most valuable feature is the network security module."
"The solution can scale."
"It allows us to be more hands off in checking on emails and networking traffic. We can set up a bunch of different alerts and have it alert us."
"The features that I find most valuable are the MIR (Mandiant Incident Response) for checks on our inbound security."
"I would like to see it better organized when I'm looking at it."
"The initial setup was complex."
"Some of our customers find this solution to be a little bit tough because they don't understand how to configure and use it."
"We had some trouble with the installation as we migrated from our previous solution."
"One thing I would like to see improved is if it could automatically be tied through ISE, instead of you having to manually get notifications and disable it yourself."
"If they can make this product more web-based, that would be amazing."
"We've had problems with element licensing costs so scalability is a concern."
"Reliance on Java. Get away from that."
"It is very expensive, the price could be better."
"Management of the appliance could be greatly improved."
"Cybersecurity posture has room for improvement."
"The product's integration capabilities are an area of concern where improvements are required."
"Improvements could be achieved through greater integration capabilities with different firewall solutions. Integrating with the dashboard itself for different firewalls so users can also pull tags into their firewall dashboard."
"The world is currently shifting to AI, but FIreEye is not following suit."
"The analytics could be better. It seems heavily influenced by the McAfee and FireEye integration, and that integration still isn't seamless."
"They can maybe consider supporting some compliance standards. When we are configuring rules and policies, it can guide whether they are compliant with a particular compliance authority. In addition, if I have configured some rules that have not been used, it should give a report saying that these rules have not been used in the last three months or six months so that I disable or delete those rules."
More Cisco Secure Network Analytics Pricing and Cost Advice →
More Trellix Network Detection and Response Pricing and Cost Advice →
Cisco Secure Network Analytics is ranked 3rd in Network Detection and Response (NDR) with 58 reviews while Trellix Network Detection and Response is ranked 7th in Network Detection and Response (NDR) with 37 reviews. Cisco Secure Network Analytics is rated 8.2, while Trellix Network Detection and Response is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Cisco Secure Network Analytics writes "Increased the visibility of what is happening in our network". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Trellix Network Detection and Response writes "Offers in-depth investigation capabilities, integrates well and smoothly transitioned from a lower-capacity appliance to a higher one". Cisco Secure Network Analytics is most compared with Darktrace, Cisco Secure Cloud Analytics, ThousandEyes, Vectra AI and Arista NDR, whereas Trellix Network Detection and Response is most compared with Fortinet FortiSandbox, Palo Alto Networks WildFire, Zscaler Internet Access, Fortinet FortiGate and Symantec Advanced Threat Protection. See our Cisco Secure Network Analytics vs. Trellix Network Detection and Response report.
See our list of best Network Detection and Response (NDR) vendors.
We monitor all Network Detection and Response (NDR) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.