We performed a comparison between Cloudability and Harness based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, Microsoft, Nutanix and others in Cloud Cost Management."Cloudability takes care of identifying and managing the cloud."
"The support from IBM is fantastic"
"Each user can have their own dashboard that they want to consume. Instead of having to share one dashboard for multiple users, you can create individual views for each user to view, and that view will contain only their own accounts, which allows for separation of data."
"It has already given us insight into how to optimize. So, we are now ramping up steadily its usage."
"The pricing isn't too expensive."
"The most valuable feature of the solution is its ability to create reports and dashboards."
"Transparency and visibility are the key features."
"The most crucial feature in reducing my cloud costs has been the rightsizing recommendations, along with the dashboards that track reserved instance spending coverage and utilization. As for Cloudability's integration with our existing cloud infrastructure, it's not integrated directly into our AWS infrastructure but rather reads and pulls data from it, providing valuable insights and analysis for cost management."
"It's a highly customizable DevOps tool."
"I wish there was a feature to temporarily remove certain recommendations from the list for teams that couldn't implement them immediately. I believe Cloudability could improve its automation functionality and enhance cost allocation modeling."
"We have dealt with a few technical support people where we ask for one thing and they might not deliver straightaway. It seems like they are a stretched across multiple customers."
"Cloudability needs to improve on data collection from cloud sources."
"The dashboard needs to include more graphs per team to show what individual teams are spending in a given time period."
"There is always room for improvement in education and training. We are not that mature in terms of our automation. It could help us identify where we could optimize in terms of build."
"There are also some limitations with the dashboards and data representation in Cloudability."
"We would like them to have a linear regression, so we can be predictive for budgets, allocations, and the year's follow ups. We also want to have a longer window of analytics with better certainty that our workload will fit the model, not just in a two week window."
"In general, I feel Cloudability wasn't able to support many resources."
"There's also room for improvement in debugging pipeline issues, which can sometimes become complex."
Cloudability is ranked 5th in Cloud Cost Management with 13 reviews while Harness is ranked 17th in Cloud Cost Management with 1 review. Cloudability is rated 7.6, while Harness is rated 7.0. The top reviewer of Cloudability writes "An excellent solution for dealing with multiple clouds". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Harness writes "Provides a good graphical interface, but the initial setup process needs improvement ". Cloudability is most compared with Azure Cost Management, VMWare Tanzu CloudHealth, IBM Turbonomic, Densify and CloudCheckr , whereas Harness is most compared with Tekton, Jenkins, Bamboo, GitHub Actions and CircleCI.
See our list of best Cloud Cost Management vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Cost Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.