We performed a comparison between CloverETL and Tableau based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tableau, Qlik, Splunk and others in Data Visualization."Key features include wealth of pre-defined components; all components are customizable; descriptive logging, especially for error messages."
"Connectivity to various data sources: The ability to extract data from different data sources gives greater flexibility."
"Server features for scheduler: It is very easy to schedule jobs and monitor them. The interface is easy to use."
"No dependence on native language and ease of use."
"The most valuable feature is the geographic data analysis."
"It's very easy to set everything up."
"This service is the combination of very pleasant, interactive graphical visualizations along with the application of advanced statistical models (in some cases)."
"It has been the best tool to work with from a self-service point of view."
"The most valuable part of the solution is the general dashboard features."
"Better interaction and less time spent with end users."
"It is definitely easy to use. It is intuitive, and more or less, everything can be done from the front end. As such, there is no concept of metadata. You can just take data from a database and start building your own stuff, such as OLAP data warehouse. You don't need extensive metadata modeling like Oracle BI."
"The most valuable feature is the aggregation function."
"Needs: easier automated failure recovery; more, and more intuitive auto-generated/filled-in code for components; easier/more automated sync between CloverETL Designer and CloverETL Server."
"Its documentation could be improved."
"Resource management: We typically run out of heap space, and even the allocation of high heap space does not seem to be enough."
"I take a long time to process the hundreds of thousands or millions of records that must be processed every day."
"The solution needs to improve its integration capabilities."
"It would be nice to include more features on each dashboard."
"It needs a little bit more advanced modeling. I would like to see functionality like Cognos has in the Framework Manager."
"Licensing and pricing options could be made better so that more users would be able to use it."
"Small multiples (a.k.a. Trellis charts) are possible only through very hacky means. Update: Still remains a challenge."
"Some of our clients are looking for better UI when using Tableau as they often work with this solution directly."
"I don't have the ability in Tableau to create a tooltip and see the picture of a piece of jewelry or watch that is a best seller."
Earn 20 points
CloverETL is ranked 42nd in Data Visualization while Tableau is ranked 1st in Data Visualization with 293 reviews. CloverETL is rated 7.0, while Tableau is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of CloverETL writes "Provides wealth of pre-defined, customizable components, and descriptive logging for errors". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tableau writes "Provides fast data access with in-memory extracts, makes it easy to create visualizations, and saves time". CloverETL is most compared with SSIS, iWay Universal Adapter Framework and Talend Open Studio, whereas Tableau is most compared with Microsoft Power BI, Domo, Amazon QuickSight, SAS Visual Analytics and Databricks.
See our list of best Data Visualization vendors.
We monitor all Data Visualization reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.