We performed a comparison between Comindware Tracker and OpenText 360 for SharePoint based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business Process Management (BPM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The configurable dashboard analytics and reporting capabilities ensure timely decision making."
"The workflow tracker helps us to track our staff's workflow. It helps us to improve the productivity of our team."
"It was easy to set up my team with access credentials to their files."
"The most valuable feature is that any non-technical personnel can easily work on the solution, redefining processes and creating drag and drop workflows according to the department or cross-department needs."
"This software added transparency to our workflows. It helped with increasing throughput of clients and their satisfaction."
"It provides a scalable solution that should allow me to grow my company without too much fuss or further set up required."
"This software makes it so easy and enjoyable to work with the team. Any user can learn and start using the application quickly."
"The ability to access Comindware Tracker from mobile has been greatly valuable to our organization. We are often out of office and this can create timeframe and task management issues. Being able to access tasks and time tracking while on the move is a great asset."
"The collaborative environment for long-term archival or record management is great."
"In terms of its most valuable features, this solution, in general, will provide all you need and it's very convenient to use. We can share our details to collaborative platforms. We can give access to users. It's pretty flexible."
"The most valuable feature of OpenText 360 for SharePoint is its performance. The solution is one of the best in the market if you search the internet."
"The most valuable features are collaboration, traceability, retention of documents, and search."
"OpenText 360's best features are platform independence and its performance when searching large numbers of documents."
"It's all now on cloud subscription, so you can use all the features without worrying about making the system updates patches."
"The fact that it allows for the internal sharing of information is very good."
"This solution has good connection and we do not need to migrate everything in order to protect the repository."
"If your organization has only a few team members then this tool is not suitable."
"We are using the backdated version of this software. That is why we lack of some features. I hope when we update the version, then all the problems will be solved."
"I am expecting new updates to improve the software."
"Figuring out how to integrate defined teams or groups into this system is difficult, and there are no contextual menus."
"The initial setup can be quite slow and finicky."
"The UX/UI could be reviewed and revamped to meet new the criteria of Digitalization and Innovation."
"This solution lacks API integration with some popular websites."
"It would be wonderful to have newer version releases more frequently, but it is quite a minor con."
"The platform's workflows could be more intuitive and easier to use."
"If I have to really create an internal knowledge management portal, if I have to compare SharePoint and WordPress, WordPress is far, far better in regard to the SharePoint option."
"OpenText 360 is generally stable, though there are sometimes issues with document size or format."
"The graphical user interface had to be more user-friendly. It's not as intuitive."
"Integration is an area where the solution lacks."
"We have a very good time to market tool, and the development platform should be made user-friendly. Mostly, it's just support."
"An area for improvement would be how the platform handles large volumes of documents. It also doesn't provide a very good, robust backup and restore capacity. In the next release, I would like the search technology to be improved."
"The user interface could definitely be improved."
Earn 20 points
Comindware Tracker is ranked 49th in Business Process Management (BPM) while OpenText 360 for SharePoint is ranked 15th in Business Process Management (BPM) with 13 reviews. Comindware Tracker is rated 9.6, while OpenText 360 for SharePoint is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Comindware Tracker writes "Easy to navigate and great for keeping everybody in the loop". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText 360 for SharePoint writes "A great, collaborative environment with scalability for many products". Comindware Tracker is most compared with , whereas OpenText 360 for SharePoint is most compared with Apache Airflow, Bizagi, Adobe Experience Manager (AEM) Forms, IBM BPM and IBM Business Automation Workflow. See our Comindware Tracker vs. OpenText 360 for SharePoint report.
See our list of best Business Process Management (BPM) vendors.
We monitor all Business Process Management (BPM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
