We performed a comparison between Coralogix and Datadog based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."A non-tech person can easily get used to it."
"The best feature of this solution allows us to correlate logs, metrics and traces."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
"The solution offers very good convenience filtering."
"The solution is easy to use and to start with."
"Numerous data monitoring tools are available, but Coralogix somehow fine-tunes our policies and effectively supports our teams."
"It is easy to implement and scale applications with standardized visibility, monitoring and alerting"
"Even if we don't end up using Datadog, it revealed problems and optimizations to us that weren't obvious before."
"The interface and the integrations make it so easy to connect to the cloud or to the on-premise environment."
"The service catalog helped improve our organization by giving a good view of the flow for our microservices applications."
"Straightforward to integrate and automate."
"The most valuable aspects of the product include the APM and profiler."
"We like the distributed tracing and flame graphs for debugging. This has been invaluable for us during periods of high traffic or red alert conditions."
"The most valuable feature I have found is the elastic container service."
"It would be helpful if Coralogix could integrate the main modules that any organization requires into a single subscription."
"Maybe they could make it more user-friendly."
"We want it to work at what it is expected to work at and not really based on the updated configuration which one developer has decided to change."
"The user interface could be more intuitive and explanatory."
"From my experience, Coralogix has horrible Terraform providers."
"The documentation of the tool could be improved"
"More granular control over dashboard sharing. Timeboard sharing."
"Once Datadog has gained wide adoption, it can often be overwhelming to both know and understand where to go to find answers to questions."
"I'm not sure what kind of features are in the roadmap right now, but I encourage the development of features for defining your organization, and allowing the visibility of what kind of metrics you can get. Those features would be really useful for us."
"Datadog needs more local Asia-Pacific support, and if they don't have a SaaS solution in Asia-Pacific, they should offer an on-prem version. I'm told that's not possible."
"It would also be nice if we had more insight into our own usage of Datadog (agents and custom metrics). They provide a usage page which does help, but it is not in real-time."
"It lacks consistency in the APIs."
"Datadog is expensive."
"The pricing is a bit confusing."
Coralogix is ranked 26th in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 7 reviews while Datadog is ranked 1st in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability with 137 reviews. Coralogix is rated 8.4, while Datadog is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Coralogix writes "Good capabilities, has a helpful interface and is straightforward to set up". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Datadog writes "Very good RUM, synthetics, and infrastructure host maps". Coralogix is most compared with Grafana, Sentry, New Relic, Elastic Search and Logz.io, whereas Datadog is most compared with Dynatrace, Azure Monitor, New Relic, AWS X-Ray and OpsRamp. See our Coralogix vs. Datadog report.
See our list of best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors and best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.