We performed a comparison between Datadog and Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Zabbix, Datadog, Auvik and others in IT Infrastructure Monitoring."We have hundreds of microservices, and knowing how top-level requests weave throughout all of them is invaluable."
"The network map is crucial in identifying bottlenecks and determining what needs more attention."
"The installation step is pretty straightforward."
"Going from viewing a metric to creating a monitor alerting on a metric is very easy."
"Most of the features in the way Datadog does monitoring are commendable and that is the reason we choose it. We did some comparisons before picking Datadog. Datadog was recommended based on the features provided."
"Profiling has been made easier."
"It helps us better manage our logs."
"The ability to easily drill down into log queries quickly and efficiently has helped us to resolve several critical incidents."
"Real-time alerting is a very important feature. We need alerts for everything. We have alarms setup and get alerts through email or third-party integrations depending on what's happening – critical VMs, high CPU usage, security concerns."
"While I like the ease of use, when compared with Tenable Nessus they could still improve their usability."
"The setup was a bit complex."
"There is occasional UI slowness and bugs."
"We need more advanced querying against logs."
"I sometimes log in and see items changed, either in the UI or a feature enabled. To see it for the first time without proper communication can sometimes come as a shock."
"The product needs to have more enterprise approach to configuration."
"One thing we have run into is that it is so easy to add monitoring that we turn on things without really understanding the costs."
"Datadog has a lot of documentation, but a lot of that documentation assumes you know how the service works, which can lead to confusion."
"Third-party connectivity is the part that needs improvement within Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service."
More Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service Pricing and Cost Advice →
Datadog is ranked 2nd in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 137 reviews while Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service is ranked 40th in IT Infrastructure Monitoring with 1 review. Datadog is rated 8.6, while Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Datadog writes "Very good RUM, synthetics, and infrastructure host maps". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service writes "Offers real-time alerting and dashboards are great for performance hubs of the database". Datadog is most compared with Dynatrace, Azure Monitor, New Relic, AWS X-Ray and Elastic Observability, whereas Oracle Infrastructure Monitoring Cloud Service is most compared with Zabbix, Nagios Core and Nagios XI.
See our list of best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.