We performed a comparison between Delinea Secret Server and ManageEngine PAM360 based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Privileged Access Management (PAM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I like the one-way hash, as well as the ability to store it in the cloud and access it from anywhere."
"It is able to manage storage and use of personal passwords."
"Provides us with the ability to control access [to secrets] by groups."
"The most valuable feature of this solution is that it provides us with a secure way of managing passwords."
"What I like best about this product is the interface."
"It offers the possibility of secure administration of hardware devices, as well as Linux systems administration from a Windows environment."
"I like that it is Windows-based. It is good that primarily, it is not an appliance. Some of the other applications in the space, such as a Quest Software CPAM or a Safeguard, are appliances, so you can't deploy the ends of them. With Thycotic, you can either install your Temporal Protection module physically in the VM host, or you can use BouncyCastle for high-security module capabilities."
"I really like the zero trust piece."
"Deployment is very quick, and only a one-time installation process is required for ManageEngine PAM360."
"We can use it remotely as well."
"I'd prefer a better commercial model that includes partners and options for consulting around it. Where I've worked with my customers, we've only been able to use their professional services, and that has been a risk and constraint."
"The initial setup and deployment can be cumbersome."
"I would like to see improvement with the integration with Azure Active Directory. This would mean that we can have support on multiple platforms such as Windows, Linux, and Mac."
"We could definitely use some help with API tokenization. If we had a way to store tokens that would be fabulous."
"This product is excellent in every way except minor details in handling extremely large environments."
"The initial setup and deployment can be cumbersome. It's not an easy process."
"The tool should integrate additional features like OCR."
"It would be better if they had a Linux version of the secret server."
"There could be improvement in latency and accessing resources for the product."
"I would rate the scalability at five out of ten. It's average."
"If you want a cost effective solution and very competitive pricing, you should go with this product."
"I don't see any features associated with multi-factor authentication in ManageEngine PAM360."
Delinea Secret Server is ranked 2nd in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 47 reviews while ManageEngine PAM360 is ranked 16th in Privileged Access Management (PAM) with 3 reviews. Delinea Secret Server is rated 8.2, while ManageEngine PAM360 is rated 6.0. The top reviewer of Delinea Secret Server writes "Effective for password rotation policies triggered by audit requirements, it helps maintain compliance standards and seamless integration with third-party tools ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of ManageEngine PAM360 writes " An easy-to-deploy and affordable tool for access control monitoring". Delinea Secret Server is most compared with CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Azure Key Vault, HashiCorp Vault, IBM Security Secret Server and CyberArk Enterprise Password Vault, whereas ManageEngine PAM360 is most compared with CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, ARCON Privileged Access Management, WALLIX Bastion, Fudo PAM and Delinea Privileged Access Service. See our Delinea Secret Server vs. ManageEngine PAM360 report.
See our list of best Privileged Access Management (PAM) vendors.
We monitor all Privileged Access Management (PAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
