Dell PowerEdge M vs HPE Synergy comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Dell Technologies Logo
3,593 views|2,407 comparisons
92% willing to recommend
Hewlett Packard Enterprise Logo
4,628 views|3,351 comparisons
91% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Dell PowerEdge M and HPE Synergy based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Blade Servers solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed Dell PowerEdge M vs. HPE Synergy Report (Updated: March 2024).
772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"The networking features for administration and working with the server are valuable.""The tool's most valuable features are high availability and scalability. Its integration is easy.""It is easy to manage by an administrator and we can spend valuable time on other IT issues.""The solution's most valuable features are centralized monitoring and management and the ease of upgrading firmware.""It helps us to manage multiple chassis from a single website.""I have compared Dell EMC to other solutions and have found it to be good. The SAN and LAN traffic, manageability, and upgradability are all good.""The solution offers remarkable flexibility, reliability, and extensive software support.""It's great for managing overall infrastructure."

More Dell PowerEdge M Pros →

"We're able to provision different applications, different demonstrations, add cloud-like speeds on-prem, which is unheard of in the industry.""In the data center, you see customers with a lot of blade enclosures and a lot of servers, and this solution works fine.""The price is reasonable, and the stability and scalability are okay. We bought the solution because it suits our needs.""The i3S module can be configured to provision storage to all blade servers and boot to any operating system without needing local hard drives.""It's a bit easier to manage than the C7000s.""Everybody noticed very large improvement in data processing. A lot of activity which took hours now takes, let's say, tens of minutes.""The hyper-converged infrastructure where everything is stateless is valuable. Basically, you have your compute storage and networking management.""The stability of the solution is very reliable."

More HPE Synergy Pros →

Cons
"More interconnections with third party equipment and limited I/O selection.""Can be improved by being proactive in making changes that could improve the solution.""Technical support is not good.""The set up is complex""I would like to have additional HPC and AI capabilities on general Dell PowerEdge servers.""Dell PowerEdge M needs to run AMD CPUs on it.""We have had some issues with the vendor's support that we have received. When you open up a support case with Dell they send a partner to assist you and in our experience, they are lacking knowledge about the solution. There are times when you need professional support from the vendor that knows the solution well.""It requires time to transition to the new generation."

More Dell PowerEdge M Cons →

"Over the two years of using HPE Synergy, we have found some hardware failures that are frequent in the SOP models, CNA cards, and converged network adapters. These failures are frequently happening for a lot of the customers.""After delivering the contract, they became a little less active. So, it needs some pushing from my side sometimes.""They have not improved their product since it was purchased.""The setup was a bit complex.""They were not so deep into integration with VMware.""One of the issues that we that we have been having is with the firmware baselining. So, we need to just making sure that we get that working. However, we are in the early stages. It may well be that we just tweak a few things.""We had some challenges during the implementation and a few issues afterward, but they were all sort of related to how Synergy interacts with Nexus. Our Nexus on the network side is managed by another group, and they had just gotten Nexus, so they weren't really familiar with how Nexus even worked. Getting these two to interact well was the majority of our issues. It really didn't have anything to do with Synergy. It points to know the environment that you are putting it in and making sure you are dotting all your i's and crossing all your t's when you are figuring out what their requirements are to communicate.""HPE Synergy could improve its remote support."

More HPE Synergy Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "It was budget friendly."
  • "If we would not have gone with the vendor we might have been charged unnecessarily for packages we did not need."
  • "Dell PowerEdge M price is comparable to other solutions but cheaper than IBM. However, the IBM solution is a higher grade solution whereas Dell PowerEdge M is a medium-level solution."
  • "The pricing of PowerEdge Next is higher than it was before."
  • "The product is neither expensive nor cheap. It is manageable for medium enterprises as well."
  • "The solution's pricing is slightly higher."
  • "The product is budget-friendly. The initial cost for each server was around 10,000 euros. It's a standard price, not too high or too low."
  • More Dell PowerEdge M Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "The Nutanix platform came in a little more expensive than the Synergy."
  • "The solution has reduced our IT infrastructure costs because we have had to buy less services than we used to."
  • "In our whole environment, the cost is in the millions. On this particular chassis, the annual cost is 12 blades times approximately $40,000."
  • "The biggest cost is the VMware licensing."
  • "We do a biannual renewal. I know how much that renewal is, but I don't know how much it breaks down to be just Synergy, since we have our VMware, all of our physical equipment, etc. all rolled up into one renewal, which is a little over $300,000 every two years. However, only a subset of that is the Synergy product."
  • "There was at least about a 20 percent savings in cost over our purchase based on the purchase price of the compute modules themselves versus what we've had to pay before. It was significantly less."
  • "Synergy has lowered our total cost of ownership significantly. I would say ballpark around 25 percent, maybe more."
  • "We bought everything outright to start with. We don't do much consumption-based stuff."
  • More HPE Synergy Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Blade Servers solutions are best for your needs.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The solution's most valuable features are centralized monitoring and management and the ease of upgrading firmware.
    Top Answer:The solution's pricing is slightly higher. However, we don't require an additional license for it. The solution's pricing depends on the customer's connectivity requirements, whether 10G, 25G, or 100… more »
    Top Answer:Cisco UCS X-series provides a GPU node and compute node in a single chassis. Dell PowerEdge M lacks GPU nodes and doesn't have a direct solution for GPUs.
    Top Answer:For me, choosing between HPE’s Bladesystem and Synergy came down to which solution was more powerful, reliable, and stable. It turns out Bladesystem was the winner. Bladesystem is excellent because it… more »
    Top Answer:It is a good product for hypervisors.
    Top Answer:You have to propose Synergy with your customer base.
    Ranking
    4th
    out of 22 in Blade Servers
    Views
    3,593
    Comparisons
    2,407
    Reviews
    8
    Average Words per Review
    479
    Rating
    8.4
    1st
    out of 22 in Blade Servers
    Views
    4,628
    Comparisons
    3,351
    Reviews
    17
    Average Words per Review
    380
    Rating
    8.3
    Comparisons
    Learn More
    Overview

    The Dell PowerEdge M-Series blade servers address the challenges of an evolving IT environment by delivering leading enterprise classfeatures and functionality. The M-Series delivers a unique array of options configured to meet the needs of your IT environment both now and in the future.

    • Multiple blade form-factor choices.
    • Long life cycle providing better life cycle management and improved TCO.
    • Modular I/O switches for future scalability.
    • Breakthrough fan technologies for reduction in power consumption.
    • Configuration management via chassis management controller.
    • Persistent MAC/WWN/iSCSI addresses in a switch-agnostic environment.

    HPE Synergy, the first platform built from the ground up for Composable Infrastructure, offers an experience that empowers IT to create and deliver new value instantly and continuously. It is a single infrastructure that reduces operational complexity for traditional workloads and increases operational velocity for the new breed of applications and services. Through a single interface, HPE Synergy composes physical and virtual compute, storage, and fabric pools into any configuration for any application. As an extensible platform, it easily enables a broad range of applications and operational models such as virtualization, hybrid cloud, and DevOps. With HPE Synergy, IT can become not just the internal service provider but the business partner to rapidly launch new applications that become the business.

    Sample Customers
    Newport City Homes, Neuroblastoma and Medulloblastoma Translational Research Consortium (NMTRC), Georgian College, AgreeYa Solutions, IIHT Cloud Solutions, Arizona State University, AudienceScience, University of the Incarnate Word (UIW), The Translational Genomics Research Institute (TGen), Holy Cross School
    HudsonAlpha, Virgin Media, EMIS, United
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Computer Software Company22%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Healthcare Company11%
    Hospitality Company11%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company14%
    Government10%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Financial Services Firm9%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Manufacturing Company11%
    Healthcare Company9%
    Retailer9%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company13%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Government8%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business40%
    Midsize Enterprise7%
    Large Enterprise53%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business26%
    Midsize Enterprise12%
    Large Enterprise63%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business29%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise57%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business20%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise65%
    Buyer's Guide
    Dell PowerEdge M vs. HPE Synergy
    March 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about Dell PowerEdge M vs. HPE Synergy and other solutions. Updated: March 2024.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    Dell PowerEdge M is ranked 4th in Blade Servers with 15 reviews while HPE Synergy is ranked 1st in Blade Servers with 87 reviews. Dell PowerEdge M is rated 8.4, while HPE Synergy is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Dell PowerEdge M writes "Average pricing and good feature sets but is complex to set up". On the other hand, the top reviewer of HPE Synergy writes "Local hard drives are not needed for the i3S module that boots to any operating system". Dell PowerEdge M is most compared with HPE Superdome X, Cisco UCS B-Series, Super Micro SuperBlade, HPE BladeSystem and Fujitsu Primergy BX900 Series, whereas HPE Synergy is most compared with HPE BladeSystem, Cisco UCS B-Series, HPE Apollo, HPE ProLiant DL Servers and HPE Superdome X. See our Dell PowerEdge M vs. HPE Synergy report.

    See our list of best Blade Servers vendors.

    We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.