We performed a comparison between Dell RecoverPoint and NetApp SnapMirror based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Replication solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The tool's most valuable feature is stability."
"The most valuable feature we have found in RecoverPoint is its ability to provide the lowest RPO."
"It excels in duplicating data between two distinct types of storage systems."
"The product does block-level replication very well."
"We use RecoverPoint for disaster recovery and asynchronous replication, and we use the application at a block level, not the software level. This has been tested, and it's very durable."
"It has improved RTO and RPO."
"The solution provides continuous data protection."
"The solution is very stable. Once it's installed, many customers forget they even have it."
"They have a very effective dashboard and good reports."
"Data protection is a valuable feature."
"The most valuable feature is the snap shot."
"The product has good performance."
"The solution is very stable."
"This solution is easy to implement and easy to use."
"NetApp SnapMirror's ease of use and reliability are valuable features."
"The most valuable feature is the data replication tool. There is also a lot of ability for data migration."
"The solution normally supports only specific types and amounts of storage. If it could be increased to support much larger amounts or a wider range, it could fetch a bigger market."
"The cost of the solution is pretty high. The licensing costs may affect a company's ability to scale."
"RecoverPoint is designed to integrate seamlessly with Dell EMC storage. If you don't have Dell EMC storage, you can't use it with other brands like IBM or HP."
"Other hypervisors should be integrated with this system. Other hypervisors should be able to get the benefits of this solution."
"I am waiting for block replication with VirtualBox."
"The support is horrible."
"It is worth mentioning that this solution is no longer supported, primarily because it doesn't replicate between two different storage systems anymore."
"Considering the speed Dell RecoverPoint can recover data, it would be good if we could replicate data from on-premise to the cloud with this solution."
"The price needs to be improved."
"It's necessary to install NetApp simulator to avoid complications."
"There is probably some limitations when it comes to the scalability of the solution."
"The price could be cheaper."
"Compression and deduplication could be improved."
"The solution's dashboard and reporting could be improved."
"We must be able to integrate Flash Pool with SnapMirror."
"It is not as efficient as it needs to be. It doesn't compress the data really well when it is forwarded to a secondary site. The download performance could be better."
Dell RecoverPoint is ranked 4th in Data Replication with 18 reviews while NetApp SnapMirror is ranked 2nd in Data Replication with 23 reviews. Dell RecoverPoint is rated 8.6, while NetApp SnapMirror is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Dell RecoverPoint writes "Snapshots allow you to restore or view the image on either the DR or production side if data is compromised and integrate seamlessly with Dell EMC storage". On the other hand, the top reviewer of NetApp SnapMirror writes "Protects our data during any emergency or disaster". Dell RecoverPoint is most compared with Dell AppSync, whereas NetApp SnapMirror is most compared with NetApp Snapshot, Hitachi TrueCopy and Dell AppSync. See our Dell RecoverPoint vs. NetApp SnapMirror report.
See our list of best Data Replication vendors.
We monitor all Data Replication reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.