DX Performance Management vs OpenText Cloud Optimizer comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
Broadcom Logo
115 views|69 comparisons
96% willing to recommend
OpenText Logo
342 views|86 comparisons
100% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between DX Performance Management and OpenText Cloud Optimizer based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Infrastructure Capacity Planning solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed DX Performance Management vs. OpenText Cloud Optimizer Report (Updated: May 2024).
772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"You can create intelligent alerts so you have enough time to replace the router or interface before it's full. The same is applicable for CBQoS channels.​""​When devices are having performance issues, it proactively build dashboards which allow us to go and do health checks, and resolve problems before they become an issue.​""Great dashboards and good integration with other solutions.""The out-of-the-box dashboards are valuable, in terms of being able to visualize performance data in ways that we haven't in the past.""One feature I like about CA Performance Management is the certification of the devices.""Downloads and records are the most valuable features.""The feature that is inherent to its core, of being able to graphically represent a trend and status, is nice.""The solution's performance itself is very good because it is a vertical database that loads very fast in comparison to other products."

More DX Performance Management Pros →

"Easy access to resources of our cloud.""It helps to plan how you can scale up your environment, and it gives an overview of your entire infra."

More OpenText Cloud Optimizer Pros →

Cons
"I have mixed feeling about the scalability. I feel like there are things which are being put into UIM right now that are not being included in Performance Center that we need to see in Performance Center. We are kind of being driven to buy UIM, and I can't justify it.​""DX Performance Management should increase high availability. If one of my two data centers goes offline and the other is operational, I need a seamless transition from the primary to the secondary data center. It's crucial to maintain consistent monitoring of the devices during this transition. Therefore, I require continuous, 24/7 monitoring of my system using this tool.""This solution's implementation process could be quicker. They could also optimize the hardware requirements.""Policies could be improved.""The quantity of views which are tied to specific metric families is too high. Also, the problem is the view doesn't tell you which metric family it uses, so you don't know why you don't see data.""CA PM can be complex to build and configure. Creating the folders / groups / sites required establishing many rule sets.""It could be a little easier to integrate new metrics.""CA PM Business Hours Filtering: I understand that all monitoring systems have defects. The Business Hours Filtering does not always function properly. Sometimes, when applying business hours to CA PM reports that are 30 or more days in duration, the report generation times out and does not display results. We have other CA PM reports that, when we apply Business Hours Filtering, the report results displayed are the same as without the filter. We are not sure if this is a defect in CA PM or if it is a result of our complex configuration (folder structure) and application of business hours."

More DX Performance Management Cons →

"It needs to improve the capacity planning.""It should have more reporting features. It will help in getting more reporting information."

More OpenText Cloud Optimizer Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "We were looking at other vendors in the marketplace for NetFlow, and CA just beat everybody else in price, cost, and the size to implement. ​"
  • "Do your homework and know how many devices you will be managing out of the gate. Be sure to project what your growth will be each year."
  • "They should provide more scalable licensing for the product."
  • "I like the licensing model because it's device-based."
  • "We purchase a license to use the solution every three years and we have multiple contracts. They have been increasing the price annually. We have a baseline for three years and then we need to pay the difference from the baseline, and we are in the process of negotiating a new price for all the licenses we need. The price overall is affordable."
  • "The tool's pricing is based on the number of network devices."
  • More DX Performance Management Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "It depends on the agreement that you have with Micro Focus. It can be a year-based term. It can be perpetual, or it can be subscription-based. Depending upon whether you're looking for an annual or a multi-year contract, the pricing would vary. It also depends on whether you are looking for standard support or premium support."
  • More OpenText Cloud Optimizer Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Infrastructure Capacity Planning solutions are best for your needs.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The tool helps us understand network performance.
    Top Answer:The tool's pricing is based on the number of network devices.
    Top Answer:DX Performance Management should increase high availability. If one of my two data centers goes offline and the other is operational, I need a seamless transition from the primary to the secondary… more »
    Ask a question

    Earn 20 points

    Ranking
    Views
    115
    Comparisons
    69
    Reviews
    7
    Average Words per Review
    512
    Rating
    8.4
    Views
    342
    Comparisons
    86
    Reviews
    0
    Average Words per Review
    0
    Rating
    N/A
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    CA Performance Management
    Micro Focus Cloud Optimizer, HPE vPV, HPE Cloud Optimizer
    Learn More
    Overview

    CA Performance Management is a comprehensive and highly scalable network performance monitoring and analytics platform. It was built to meet the unique demands of big data and modern networks architectures, including highly dynamic and complex hybrid cloud and software-defined networks (SDN).

    The platform is design to reduce complexity inherent in modern networks built across numerous technology stacks through advanced network performance monitoring and relationship mapping for improved operational assurance.

    Combined with CA Virtual Network Assurance, the platform extends operator visibility through advanced discovery and network performance monitoring of highly sensitive cloud and multi-layered SDN networks and service chains.

    OpenText Cloud Optimizer is a unified capacity management and performance tool that enables you to monitor, troubleshoot, and optimize hybrid cloud environments quickly, efficiently, and with rapid results. Cloud Optimizer's unified dashboard provides comprehensive insights into capacity, performance, and health across hybrid cloud environments. With this consolidated insight you can optimize your infrastructure and quickly solve virtualization and cloud performance issues. Cloud Optimizer works with multiple hypervisors and private and public cloud environments including Micro Focus Helion OpenStack, VMware, Microsoft, Hyper-V, KVM, Xen, OpenStack, and Amazon Web Services.

    Sample Customers
    Jack Henry & Assoc, Target, CenturyLink, Bell Canada, BrightHouse Networks, Telus, Unisys, Verizon, Southern California Edison, GEICO, Fidelity Investments, Wells Fargo, American Family Insurance Group, Deutsche Telekom AG 
    Information Not Available
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm24%
    Insurance Company24%
    Comms Service Provider19%
    Retailer10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm25%
    Computer Software Company16%
    Manufacturing Company8%
    Comms Service Provider7%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Financial Services Firm29%
    Computer Software Company22%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    Educational Organization5%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business17%
    Large Enterprise83%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise10%
    Large Enterprise66%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business30%
    Midsize Enterprise14%
    Large Enterprise56%
    Buyer's Guide
    DX Performance Management vs. OpenText Cloud Optimizer
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about DX Performance Management vs. OpenText Cloud Optimizer and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    772,649 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    DX Performance Management is ranked 2nd in Infrastructure Capacity Planning with 31 reviews while OpenText Cloud Optimizer is ranked 3rd in Infrastructure Capacity Planning. DX Performance Management is rated 8.2, while OpenText Cloud Optimizer is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of DX Performance Management writes "The vertical database loads faster than any other product available". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Cloud Optimizer writes "Gives an overview of the entire infrastructure and helps with the optimization and capacity planning". DX Performance Management is most compared with DX Spectrum, OmniPeek and SolarWinds AppOptics, whereas OpenText Cloud Optimizer is most compared with BMC TrueSight Capacity Optimization. See our DX Performance Management vs. OpenText Cloud Optimizer report.

    See our list of best Infrastructure Capacity Planning vendors.

    We monitor all Infrastructure Capacity Planning reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.