We performed a comparison between Dynatrace and Falcon LogScale based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Splunk, Wazuh, Datadog and others in Log Management."We're able to pinpoint web and mobile interface issues before they trigger a negative customer experience."
"We found Dynatrace is a robust tool which provides pretty good monitoring for a PCF environment"
"The user interface is like a type of dashboard. You can use the tool as an end user into the tool interface, which is good."
"It is easy to see what areas you want to alert on and catch."
"The monitoring is very good."
"Support from Dynatrace is excellent. They are always on hand for any queries, demos, and/or issues."
"From a diagnosing standpoint, it has been a game changer. Before, we did not have monitoring, so anytime there was an issue, it was just guess-and-check."
"Dynatrace has multiple features that I need, but I love that you can analyze traffic, including any bottlenecks. I also find the tool user-friendly and has an easy-to-navigate interface."
"It offers the capability to view live log ingestion directly from the console which means you can seamlessly manage live log data ingestion alongside accessing and analyzing older data from the past."
"Our primary wish list for RFEs or feature requests are additional integration options with ticketing systems. Although, we are able to work around it, 'ticketing' is not a core function of the product."
"I would like to see the Business Transactions made easier, so you can distinguish users and companies (this can get very hairy for a large multi-tenant application)."
"I would love to see Dynatrace get more involved in the security realm. I get badgered by so many endpoint protection companies. It seems like a natural fit to me, that Dynatrace should be playing in that space."
"It would be nice to get the AI piece into AppMon."
"I would like to have the ability to share live data with selected third parties so that they can see how their product is performing for our company."
"Dynatrace has APIs, but they are unfriendly APIs. If they were friendly like Splunk or Sumo Logic had, we might integrate that same data on a single webpage, then start showing these internally."
"An area for improvement would be security. In the next release, I'd like to see more network-centric capabilities - Dynatrace is good at the network level, but I have to leverage other network solutions and integrate with them, but a holistic approach including the network as a one-stop-shop would be great."
"Dynatrace needs to improve its configuration."
"There are some overlapping features found in multiple tools."
Dynatrace is ranked 4th in Log Management with 342 reviews while Falcon LogScale is ranked 34th in Log Management with 1 review. Dynatrace is rated 8.8, while Falcon LogScale is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Dynatrace writes "AI identifies all the components of a response-time issue or failure, hugely benefiting our triage efforts". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Falcon LogScale writes "A highly commendable and robust solution offering powerful features and comprehensive log data management". Dynatrace is most compared with Datadog, New Relic, AppDynamics, Splunk Enterprise Security and Azure Monitor, whereas Falcon LogScale is most compared with Elastic Stack, Splunk Enterprise Security, Grafana Loki, LogRhythm SIEM and Logpoint.
See our list of best Log Management vendors.
We monitor all Log Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.