We performed a comparison between Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention and GTB Technologies Inspector based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Loss Prevention (DLP) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature of this solution is that it captures where the data is being moved."
"After the configuration, it is very stable, and in the last two years, I haven't been faced with many issues or product-related challenges."
"We don't require a lot of downtime, but when we do then we are getting proper support with no issue."
"The integration is great."
"The most valuable feature is security."
"I like the SaaS solution they're offering now a little bit more. It's a new product but it's easy to install and configure."
"It was mostly stable."
"The workflow remediation is quite good. That is a key feature because of which it has the upper hand over other DLP solutions."
"The classifications in place are very helpful in making policies for ensuring sensitive data can be contained."
"The product has a centralized console for everything."
"The main thing that I like about GTB is that it has a single agent for DLP and data classification. You can use the same agent. In terms of licensing too, it has a single license. When it comes to data classification, it supports open-source document platforms such as ChainSoft and OpenOffice."
"The most valuable feature is we can develop what we want. If we have an old or new requirement, they are able to support us to develop it all within one month."
"This solution helps classify what is confidential and what is not, allowing products to be installed at home if they do not contain confidential information."
"I am impressed with the tool's ease of deployment."
"They have a fingerprint feature that is very awesome. OCR is very awesome to have too."
"Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention can improve by having an uninstall option for the client or restart of a client agent can be controlled from the server. This feature is missing which is available with other solutions."
"With respect to the discovery component, the reports are very hard to interpret because they come out in an illogical format."
"It should integrate better with email."
"The APIs for device integration are limited, so that could be improved."
"The price could be reduced to be more cost, effective."
"You have to monitor the solution all the time."
"Everything can be improved and maybe there is a way to improve the user experience through the interface."
"The solution's interface is still not user-friendly for some customers. So, its interface can be better."
"The product needs to improve its support so that users can just log in and create tickets as opposed to sending emails. Sending emails is difficult to track. It also needs to work on its analytics platform."
"It would be great if they have information rights management (IRM) on the same agent."
"They have a roadmap for the Linux platform and Mac as well, and in the next quarter, they might have patch management also for Windows. However, they don't have that much for Linux and Mac. So, we need those things in Linux and Mac as well."
"The solution could improve by providing additional availability requirements."
"The performance could be better."
"The solution’s performance must be improved."
"To stay competitive, they should expand to smartphones."
More Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention Pricing and Cost Advice →
Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is ranked 2nd in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 52 reviews while GTB Technologies Inspector is ranked 16th in Data Loss Prevention (DLP) with 7 reviews. Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is rated 8.0, while GTB Technologies Inspector is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention writes "DLP great for encryptions; tech support is quite helpful". On the other hand, the top reviewer of GTB Technologies Inspector writes "Good policy creation and data protection but needs better performance". Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention is most compared with Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention, Digital Guardian, Symantec Data Loss Prevention, CoSoSys Endpoint Protector and Palo Alto Networks Enterprise Data Loss Prevention, whereas GTB Technologies Inspector is most compared with Symantec Data Loss Prevention, Varonis Platform, CoSoSys Endpoint Protector, Microsoft Purview Data Loss Prevention and Digital Guardian. See our Forcepoint Data Loss Prevention vs. GTB Technologies Inspector report.
See our list of best Data Loss Prevention (DLP) vendors.
We monitor all Data Loss Prevention (DLP) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.