We performed a comparison between Fortinet FortiWeb and R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon Web Services (AWS), F5, Microsoft and others in Web Application Firewall (WAF)."L-7 protection makes possible to protect legacy/not up-to-date servers/applications without changing the application code."
"Also, if you serve files or you accept files with your server, Fortiweb has built-in antivirus. The Fortinet product family also provides good IP intelligence (botnet C&C, etc.)."
"The solution has a good sandbox feature."
"The most important feature of this solution is protection from attack."
"The most valuable feature is the attack signature and machine learning."
"The product has a very user-friendly dashboard."
"The support is quite good."
"High-performance and detection engines, provide a high rate of exposure of web attacks."
"The three most valuable features that I noticed are the geo-localization of the user, the IP reputation, and the compartmental analysis."
"I would like to have an antivirus option."
"FortiWeb needs to have support for the newest technology being used in web applications."
"The solution could improve by providing more integration with solutions other than the Fortinet family."
"Fortinet FortiWeb is not scalable. You'll need more budget to change the hardware."
"When we look at the incident reports in the dashboard, they are available for a maximum duration of 24 hours. They should provide more time for the analysis and increase the duration of the availability of these reports. Currently, it gives the options for 5 minutes, 1 hour, and 24 hours. It would be excellent if there are more options for a longer time period. It may be configurable, but I don't know how to do it."
"HA Architecture needs improvement. I would improve it by working on AP HA."
"It costs too much."
"It can be better with web application firewalls."
"The area that should be improved is licensing."
Fortinet FortiWeb is ranked 4th in Web Application Firewall (WAF) with 83 reviews while R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) is ranked 32nd in Web Application Firewall (WAF). Fortinet FortiWeb is rated 8.0, while R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) is rated 9.0. The top reviewer of Fortinet FortiWeb writes "Cost-effective, easy to configure, and works very well as a single solution for multiple environments". On the other hand, the top reviewer of R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) writes "Geo-localization and IP reputation help to keep our clients secure and more available". Fortinet FortiWeb is most compared with F5 Advanced WAF, Fortinet FortiADC, AWS WAF, Azure Web Application Firewall and Imperva Web Application Firewall, whereas R&S Web Application Firewall (DenyAll) is most compared with AWS WAF and Akamai App and API Protector.
See our list of best Web Application Firewall (WAF) vendors.
We monitor all Web Application Firewall (WAF) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.