We performed a comparison between Git and Liquibase based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Atlassian, GitHub, Git and others in Version Control."Git has a lot of online tutorials and resources available."
"Git offers the ability to roll back to the previous version. You can also track all the small changes that you do."
"The best thing about this solution is that it can be learned very quickly, and used very easily."
"What I find the most valuable about Git is that it is CLI and GUI-supported. People who do not like using the CLI mode can use the GUI mode."
"I believe it is beneficial to maintain a detailed log or history of who did what to a project and which user committed to the change."
"Git is easy to use."
"The implementation is easy."
"Code versioning, for example, we work in the branch and want to come back to this branch another time.Git is a very useful tool, helpful to collaborate with other members in the group to finish more rapidly our work."
"The solution is easy to use, and it has very clear documentation."
"They have some nice features around the automation of rule checking. They have a rules engine that checks the SQL code so that you can actually do your edit checks on the validity of the SQL code. If you don't want certain tables to be able to have certain things done to them, you can have it checked for that. It's a very flexible way to kind of do an automated peer review of the SQL code to catch things before you actually try to deploy it."
"It will be useful for teams to automate and reduce manual work."
"I believe there is room for improvement in preventing work loss due to conflicts or overwriting. Another area for improvement could be implementing features for automated code verification within Git."
"We would like to see tutorials added to the product, for new users to follow so that they can optimize their use of the solution."
"The product needs to improve its UI."
"Git can improve the size of the depository it can handle and add the capability to detect the change between common files, such as Excel and PDF documents."
"Git removed the credential feature."
"The platform could have a feature for monitoring data recovery similar to Azure."
"The tool's user interface is terrible. It needs to be more user-friendly."
"The GUI needs to be improved."
"The pricing is quite high."
"One thing we faced issues with is that Liquibase does not show the exact error, which added to the complexity."
"We were not able to delete some of the tables because of a security issue."
Earn 20 points
Git is ranked 4th in Version Control with 37 reviews while Liquibase is ranked 7th in Version Control with 3 reviews. Git is rated 8.6, while Liquibase is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of Git writes "A stable solution that can aid its users in maintaining all application developments ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Liquibase writes "Easy to use, but we were not able to delete some of the tables because of a security issue". Git is most compared with Atlassian SourceTree, Canonical Bazaar, Surround SCM, IBM Rational ClearCase and Bitbucket, whereas Liquibase is most compared with Bitbucket and DBmaestro Database Source Control.
See our list of best Version Control vendors.
We monitor all Version Control reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.