We performed a comparison between GitHub CoPilot and OutSystems based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Rapid Application Development Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The product's most valuable feature is vulnerability management features."
"GitHub CoPilot helps us auto-complete code. The tool's context awareness benefits our projects because it identifies the context in which we are working and automatically proposes solutions that we use."
"Initially, OpenAI is free, but you'll need to pay for it later."
"The document generation features are valuable."
"The product is easy to integrate."
"The most valuable aspects in terms of features, revolve around its code generation capabilities."
"The initial setup of the product is easy."
"The product's initial setup is straightforward because it's pushed through the updates."
"The flow editor is the most valuable feature. It is simple and intuitive, and it can guide you step-by-step."
"OutSystems' low-cost approach has positively impacted our productivity, because we were able to develop faster with OutSystems, enabling us to implement many changes during our sprint."
"For me, the most valuable feature is the flexibility the tools give us to change any customer requirements on the fly, when we are in a meeting. I also like how easy it is to deploy the code between environments and how easy it is to integrate OutSystems with other systems."
"We can do the validation before calling the API."
"The most valuable feature of OutSystems with discipline and the development processes. Instead of each developer doing tasks on their own with their own approach, et cetera, the solution would help bring some organization to the development process."
"The most valuable feature is Agile development. I love that you save a lot of time on development and can focus on logic and business requirements."
"The technical support is perfect."
"In terms of user support and community engagement, I rate the tool a ten out of ten."
"The suggestions provided by the product must be improved."
"In a few cases, the results aren't correct, so that needs improvement. Also, it would be great if the results could be presented in different formats, not just text. As engineers, it takes time to read through text-based results."
"There's room for improvement to ensure that suggestions align more precisely with the context of what I'm seeking, minimizing instances of unrelated or inaccurate code suggestions."
"Some of the suggestions provided by GitHub CoPilot are not accurate, making it an area of concern where improvements are required."
"GitHub CoPilot's stability is an area of concern where improvements are required."
"The solution is expensive. It should also support other programming languages."
"The tool needs to focus on integration, as it is the most important aspect. I would like to see some pre-designed modules included in my projects."
"GitHub CoPilot’s integration with other solutions could be improved."
"The product could be improved if there was a shortcut, or predefined, predictable templates provided."
"There are many tutorials available but they are very basic and good for learning the platform. To develop an enterprise-grade application, advanced tutorials need to be developed to help IT professionals design/develop high-quality/performance applications."
"The solution's testing framework needs to be improved, and the workflow should be slightly more mature."
"The resource availability needs to be increased."
"The installation is a bit tedious."
"The asynchronous processing and multithreading tasks for which the current resources of the platform are very generic and not built for the end-user. Any asynchronous jobs have to be constructed with an end-user dashboard to allow inspection of the status of the activities."
"There is room for improvement in technical support."
"The tool needs to improve the efficiency of its widgets."
GitHub CoPilot is ranked 15th in Rapid Application Development Software with 11 reviews while OutSystems is ranked 3rd in Rapid Application Development Software with 46 reviews. GitHub CoPilot is rated 8.6, while OutSystems is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of GitHub CoPilot writes "Though it offers good integration features, the price needs to be lowered". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OutSystems writes "The visual program provides the advantage of only requiring one skill set for both the front and backend ". GitHub CoPilot is most compared with GitLab, Oracle Application Express (APEX), Pega BPM, ServiceNow and Adobe ColdFusion, whereas OutSystems is most compared with Microsoft Power Apps, Mendix, Appian, ServiceNow and SAP Mobile Platform. See our GitHub CoPilot vs. OutSystems report.
See our list of best Rapid Application Development Software vendors.
We monitor all Rapid Application Development Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.