We performed a comparison between GitLab and Inedo BuildMaster based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Build Automation."CI/CD is valuable for me."
"It is scalable."
"The solution is stable."
"The solution's most valuable feature is that it is compatible with GitHub. The product's integration capabilities are sufficient for our small company of 35 people."
"We like that we can create branches and then the branches can be reviewed and you can mesh those branches back. You can independently work with your own branch, you don't need to really control the core of other people."
"A user friendly solution."
"The most valuable feature of GitLab is the ability to upload scripts and make changes when needed and then reupload them. Additionally, the solution is user-friendly."
"I like GitLab's security and SAS tools."
"Technical support is quick to respond. I haven't had any issues with them."
"As a partner, sometimes it's difficult to get support. They have a really complicated procedure for their support."
"I believe there's room for improvement in the advanced features, particularly in enhancing the pipeline functionalities."
"The solution should be more cloud-native and have more cloud-native capabilities and features."
"As GitLab is not perfect, what needs improvement in the solution is the Wiki feature of the groups or the repertories because currently, it's not searchable by default. You'll need an indexing service such as Elasticsearch to make it searchable, and that requires too much work, so for me, it's the main feature that should be improved in GitLab. In the next version of the solution, from the top of my head, the documentation could be improved. Besides the Wiki, it would be good if there's documentation that would be automatically generated based on the code repository. In other words, there should be some tutorials from GitLab for developers in the next release."
"GitLab would be improved with the addition of templates for deployment on local PCs."
"Merge conflicts and repository maintenance could improve. If there is someone new to the system they would not know if there is a conflict."
"The integration and storage capabilities could be better."
"I would like more Agile features in the Premium version. The Premium version should have all Agile features that exist in the Ultimate version. IBM AOM has a complete Agile implementation, but in GitLab, you only have these features if you buy the Ultimate version. It would be good if we can use these in the Premium version."
"The documentation should be better. It should be very easy to call REST APIs, and the documentation has to be perfect for that."
GitLab is ranked 1st in Build Automation with 70 reviews while Inedo BuildMaster is ranked 21st in Build Automation with 1 review. GitLab is rated 8.6, while Inedo BuildMaster is rated 6.0. The top reviewer of GitLab writes "Powerful, mature, and easy to set up and manage". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Inedo BuildMaster writes "Deployment agent that allows us to deploy out to various other servers but doesn't provide build automation". GitLab is most compared with Microsoft Azure DevOps, SonarQube, Bamboo, AWS CodePipeline and Tekton, whereas Inedo BuildMaster is most compared with .
See our list of best Build Automation vendors.
We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.