HCL AppScan vs PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional comparison

Cancel
You must select at least 2 products to compare!
HCLTech Logo
5,423 views|4,191 comparisons
82% willing to recommend
PortSwigger Logo
4,908 views|3,247 comparisons
98% willing to recommend
Comparison Buyer's Guide
Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between HCL AppScan and PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two Application Security Tools solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
To learn more, read our detailed HCL AppScan vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional Report (Updated: May 2024).
771,157 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Featured Review
Quotes From Members
We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use.
Here are some excerpts of what they said:
Pros
"You can easily find particular features and functions through the UI.""It provides a better integration for our ecosystem.""This is a stable solution.""The UI was very intuitive.""The most valuable feature of the solution is Postman.""The product is useful, particularly in its sensitivity and scanning capabilities.""It was easy to set up.""It comes with all of the templates that we need. For example, we are a company that is regulated by PCI. In order to be PCI compliant, we have a lot of checks and procedures to which we have to comply."

More HCL AppScan Pros →

"The most valuable feature is Burp Collaborator.""The most valuable feature is the application security. It also has a reasonable price.""The intercepting feature is the most valuable.""BurpSuite helps us to identify and fix silly mistakes that are sometimes introduced by our developers in their coding.""The solution is stable.""We use the solution for vulnerability assessment in respect of the application and the sites.""The most valuable features are Burp Intruder and Burp Scanner.""It's good testing software."

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional Pros →

Cons
"Visibility is an issue for us. Our partners do not know we have integrations with some of IBM products.""The dashboard, for AppScan or the Fortified fast tool, which we use needs to be improved.""IBM Security AppScan needs to add performance optimization for quickly scanning the target web applications.""We have experienced challenges when trying to integrate this solution with other products. When you compare it with the other SecOps products, the quality of the output is too low. It is not a new-age product. It is very outdated.""Scans become slow on large websites.""I would like to see the roadmap for this product. We are still waiting to see it as we have only so many resources.""In future releases, I would like to see more aggressive reports. I would also like to see less false positives.""The pricing has room for improvement."

More HCL AppScan Cons →

"The Iran market does not have after-sales support. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional needs to provide after-sales support.""I would like to see the return of the spider mechanism instead of the crawling feature. Burp Suite's earlier version 1.7 had an excellent spider option, and it would be beneficial if Burp incorporated those features into the current version. The crawling techniques used in the current version are not as efficient as those used in earlier versions.""Sometimes the solution can run a little slow.""The biggest improvement that I would like to see from PortSwigger that today many people see as an issue in their testing. There might be a feature which might be desired.""The solution doesn't offer very good scalability.""As with most automated security tools, too many false positives.""The pricing of the solution is quite high.""Currently, the scanning is only available in the full version of Burp, and not in the Community version."

More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional Cons →

Pricing and Cost Advice
  • "AppScan is a little bit expensive. IBM needs to work a little bit on the pricing model, decreasing the license cost."
  • "With the features, that they offer, and the support, they offer, AppScan pricing is on a higher level."
  • "Pricing was the main reason that we went ahead with this solution as they were the lowest in the market."
  • "HCL AppScan is expensive."
  • "I would rate the product's pricing a nine out of ten. The product's pricing is expensive compared to the features that they offer."
  • "The price is very expensive."
  • "The solution is moderately priced."
  • "The price of HCL AppScan is okay, in my opinion. You just buy HCL AppScan and don't pay anything anymore, meaning it is just a one-time purchase."
  • More HCL AppScan Pricing and Cost Advice →

  • "This is a value for money product."
  • "The cost is approximately $500 for a single license, and there are no additional costs beyond the standard licensing fees."
  • "Our licensing cost is approximately $400 USD per year."
  • "The yearly cost is about $300."
  • "There is no setup cost and the cost of licensing is affordable."
  • "Licensing costs are about $450/year for one use. For larger organizations, they're able to test against multiple applications while simultaneously others might have multiple versions of applications which needs to be tested which is why we have the enterprise edition."
  • "There are different licenses available that include a free version."
  • "At $400 or $500 per license paid annually, it is a very cheap tool."
  • More PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional Pricing and Cost Advice →

    report
    Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Security Tools solutions are best for your needs.
    771,157 professionals have used our research since 2012.
    Questions from the Community
    Top Answer:The product has valuable features for static and dynamic testing.
    Top Answer:HCL AppScan generates false results. Sometimes, it incorrectly identifies requests as vulnerable when they are not vulnerable. In the ADSL feature managed, the primary objective is to identify… more »
    Top Answer:HCL AppScan efficiently scans through the website and identifies vulnerabilities for AWS. It is reducing tools day by day, making it more efficient.
    Top Answer:OWASP Zap and PortSwigger Burp Suite Pro have many similar features. OWASP Zap has web application scanning available with basic security vulnerabilities while Burp Suite Pro has it available with… more »
    Top Answer:The solution helped us discover vulnerabilities in our applications.
    Top Answer:I rate the pricing a ten out of ten. There are no additional costs associated with the product.
    Ranking
    Views
    5,423
    Comparisons
    4,191
    Reviews
    16
    Average Words per Review
    360
    Rating
    7.2
    Views
    4,908
    Comparisons
    3,247
    Reviews
    22
    Average Words per Review
    489
    Rating
    8.8
    Comparisons
    Also Known As
    IBM Security AppScan, Rational AppScan, AppScan
    Burp
    Learn More
    Overview

    IBM Security AppScan enhances web application security and mobile application security, improves application security program management and strengthens regulatory compliance. By scanning your web and mobile applications prior to deployment, AppScan enables you to identify security vulnerabilities and generate reports and fix recommendations.

    Burp Suite Professional, by PortSwigger, is the world’s leading toolkit for web security testing. Over 52,000 users worldwide, across all industries and organization sizes, trust Burp Suite Professional to find more vulnerabilities, faster. With expertly-engineered manual and automated tooling, you're able to test smarter - not harder.

    PortSwigger is the web security company that is enabling the world to secure the web. Over 50,000 security engineers rely on our software and expertise to secure their world.

    Sample Customers
    Essex Technology Group Inc., Cisco, West Virginia University, APIS IT
    Google, Amazon, NASA, FedEx, P&G, Salesforce
    Top Industries
    REVIEWERS
    Government15%
    Transportation Company15%
    Manufacturing Company10%
    Insurance Company10%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company19%
    Financial Services Firm14%
    Government9%
    Manufacturing Company9%
    REVIEWERS
    Financial Services Firm22%
    Manufacturing Company22%
    Computer Software Company19%
    Comms Service Provider13%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Computer Software Company17%
    Financial Services Firm11%
    Government9%
    Comms Service Provider9%
    Company Size
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business24%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise63%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business16%
    Midsize Enterprise13%
    Large Enterprise72%
    REVIEWERS
    Small Business22%
    Midsize Enterprise21%
    Large Enterprise57%
    VISITORS READING REVIEWS
    Small Business21%
    Midsize Enterprise15%
    Large Enterprise63%
    Buyer's Guide
    HCL AppScan vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional
    May 2024
    Find out what your peers are saying about HCL AppScan vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional and other solutions. Updated: May 2024.
    771,157 professionals have used our research since 2012.

    HCL AppScan is ranked 15th in Application Security Tools with 40 reviews while PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is ranked 9th in Application Security Tools with 57 reviews. HCL AppScan is rated 7.6, while PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is rated 8.6. The top reviewer of HCL AppScan writes " A stable and scalable product useful for application security scanning". On the other hand, the top reviewer of PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional writes "The solution is versatile and easy to deploy, but it needs to give more detailed security reports". HCL AppScan is most compared with SonarQube, Veracode, Acunetix, OWASP Zap and Checkmarx One, whereas PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional is most compared with OWASP Zap, Fortify WebInspect, Acunetix, Qualys Web Application Scanning and SonarQube. See our HCL AppScan vs. PortSwigger Burp Suite Professional report.

    See our list of best Application Security Tools vendors and best Static Application Security Testing (SAST) vendors.

    We monitor all Application Security Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.