We performed a comparison between HPE Wireless WAN and Ubiquiti Wireless based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Wireless WAN solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The performance is good."
"The most valuable features of HPE Wireless WAN are high quality and capability."
"The support has been responsive and helpful."
"It is a good and stable solution."
"HPE Wireless is easy to use. Integration is not an issue. It is easy to integrate HPE Wireless with any operating system and other brands of switches."
"It is a new product backed by HPE's expertise in networking and telecommunications. We can also work with 3Com products."
"What's most valuable in HPE Wireless WAN is that it works fine for customers with existing HPE controllers."
"Setting up the solution initially is very easy."
"Easy to set up and maintain and simple to configure."
"The UniFi Controller Software provides excellent statistical and monitoring facilities."
"It's very easy to deploy."
"Ubiquiti Wireless is extremely easy to set up."
"Installation is easy with seamless integration of additional APs."
"I like that it's very easy and very stable. It's easy to install as well."
"The failure rate is very low on these devices - I've had them installed for five years and have only lost one out of a hundred."
"Having dual-band is important. Having compatibility with very old equipment on certain frequencies, for example on 2.4 and 5.8."
"The HPE Wireless dashboard could be more user-friendly."
"I would say that the integration with other vendors in areas such as management or the visibility of other vendors in the management tools could be improved."
"In the next release of the solution, there should be better integration with other platforms."
"The tool must warn the management about unwanted traffic."
"HPE should improve performance and stability."
"The license cost of the product is an area where the prices are neither expensive nor cheap, leaving a scope for the prices to be lowered further."
"Technical support could be improved. They could respond a bit faster."
"The installation is easy. However, my implementation is complicated and you would need special training to complete it."
"This product has issues with scalability and ease of manageability at scale. Security also needs to be improved, when compared to its competitors. Ubiquiti Wireless doesn't have any support that you can call. They only have an online portal where you can access support documentation, but it's not great. You have to figure out issues and solutions for yourself."
"We use different models of the solution but in some cases, the security could improve in the adaptive portal, be a little more robust, and easier to use."
"This might not be the best solution for a very large organization."
"Ubiquiti is also slow to adopt new technologies. We are transitioning to Wi-Fi 6, and there aren't many products. They have mostly Wi-Fi 5 products, but there are only two Wi-Fi 6 products. It's okay for places we have already equipped, but it's a bit hard for new places."
"I would like local support from the parent company."
"The solution should offer simpler management for guests. That would be helpful in the hospitality industry, for example."
"Performance could be improved in the solution because when I compare it with Ruckus and other APs, some of those APs are better performing, so you don't have to deploy too many APs to get the same level of Wi-Fi coverage and stability. It's not about how many clients the solution can handle, but it is more about stability and coverage. Another room for improvement in Ubiquiti Wireless, compared to other brands, is that it doesn't do well when used in an office network. It has a limitation on how reliable the AP of the system is."
"The solution needs to improve its features and offer more to the customer."
HPE Wireless WAN is ranked 7th in Wireless WAN with 18 reviews while Ubiquiti Wireless is ranked 1st in Wireless WAN with 68 reviews. HPE Wireless WAN is rated 7.8, while Ubiquiti Wireless is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of HPE Wireless WAN writes " A tool that ensures to provide seamless connectivity to its users". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Ubiquiti Wireless writes "It's cheap and easy to use but isn't suitable for large deployments or complex use cases ". HPE Wireless WAN is most compared with , whereas Ubiquiti Wireless is most compared with Ruckus Wireless WAN, Cisco Meraki Wireless LAN, Cambium Networks Wireless WAN, Aruba Wireless and ExtremeCloud IQ. See our HPE Wireless WAN vs. Ubiquiti Wireless report.
See our list of best Wireless WAN vendors.
We monitor all Wireless WAN reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.