We performed a comparison between IBM Data Governance and Informatica Axon based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Collibra, Informatica and others in Data Governance."IBM Data Governance improved data analytics operations. During a company merger, we used IBM Data Governance to understand and bridge sample data between systems."
"You can extract and transfer your data as you wish it to be consumed later."
"The feature of auto-onboarding of the assets, enterprise assets via EDC is good."
"The product is stable."
"The most valuable feature of Informatica Axon is that it is flexible and user-friendly."
"The most valuable feature of Informatica Axon has been the data marketplace."
"Axon has a marketplace that allows you to showcase all the assets the data owner has, so they can request access. That's one feature we use extensively. Axon also offers great visibility and intuitive searchability, allowing you to easily search data assets. You can check the lineage and see the work EDC does. EDC handles all the classification, cataloging, and lineage. It's integrated with Axon, and anyone can see that."
"The best thing about Informatica Axon is that it integrates with the Electronic Data Capture and the Axon system."
"The solution allows the complete governance process, starting from the data quality, those definitions, and it can get the data quality in the EDC."
"One area with room for improvement would be the ability to generate detailed quality reports. Some Python libraries provide quality scores and reports—having that capability within IBM Data Governance would be beneficial."
"The stability and the integration of the solution have room for improvement."
"There are some limitations with Informatica Axon when one tries to connect or integrate it with Jira."
"I would like to have the solution in one product and technical support needs to be better."
"The solution still is a bit manual in its functionality. We want t to be more automation-driven."
"Informatica Axon's response times and certain aspects of the admin panel could be enhanced for better usability."
"They could improve technical support because it is not good enough at the moment."
"Informatica Axon needs more integration connectors so that it can connect to systems and different kinds of datasets."
"Though EDC has maximum coverage, a few things were not available to scan, but I think EDC is evolving to address this issue."
IBM Data Governance is ranked 19th in Data Governance with 1 review while Informatica Axon is ranked 3rd in Data Governance with 23 reviews. IBM Data Governance is rated 8.0, while Informatica Axon is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of IBM Data Governance writes "Provides a single interface to monitor and navigate data quality metrics". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Informatica Axon writes "It has a marketplace that allows you to showcase all the assets the data owner has". IBM Data Governance is most compared with Microsoft Purview Data Governance and Collibra Governance, whereas Informatica Axon is most compared with Microsoft Purview Data Governance, Collibra Governance, Alation Data Catalog, BigID and Atlan.
See our list of best Data Governance vendors.
We monitor all Data Governance reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
Besides features, don't forget to look at user experience and software performance. One of your choices is significantly lacking in both areas. You might consider adding erwin Data Intelligence Suite to your list. Something you might find interesting: Alation vs Collibra vs Quest (erwin) 2022 | Gartner Peer Insights You can change the products you are comparing, seeing how others have rated the tools you are looking at.