We performed a comparison between IBM InfoSphere Optim and Oracle Enterprise Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Database Development and Management solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."I feel the solution to be a bit faster than the traditional methods, which makes it easy to customize."
"We like that we can easily restore the database with just a few clicks. The database is linked as well."
"I have found the uptime of all of our systems to be most valuable with this solution. This is important because we need to guarantee specific uptime and preventive maintenance. We need to know upfront if there are going to be any issues on the database so we can proactively solve those."
"We use Oracle Enterprise Manager as a tool to monitor Oracle products."
"It can also help with capacity planning, sizing, and maximizing overall performance in a large scale environment."
"It is the best monitoring tool for Oracle databases."
"The 13cR2 updates to the OEM family, strongly integrate Cloud (off-site, hybrid and on-premise) services providing a seamless way to see all of your resources regardless of where they are deployed."
"It's a useful feature to be able to see the top SQL, the number of executions, the CPU, and the resources that it's using."
"It's user friendly."
"The job subsystem, monitoring subsystem, alerting, grouping of targets, and reporting features are valuable to us."
"We're looking for a solution that can be implemented on AWS. IBM InfoSphere Optim can be implemented on AWS, but it costs more than double what we're currently paying. So, it's not really of good value for us."
"While the solution is very supportive of Db2, it is not so friendly when it comes to IMS databases."
"The deployment is not straightforward."
"Improving the integration speed would be beneficial, as the current Java-based system can sometimes result in slow responses."
"Reporting and statistical charting is largely still left up the end-user to develop custom solutions."
"The user interface is not very interactive. It needs improvement."
"They should improve the hover text context. This would provide assistance whenever a task is attempted by a DBA."
"Oracle Enterprise Manager could improve the monitoring types and the graphics."
"The interface could be more friendly for basic users."
"I would say mostly backup and recovery, through the Enterprise Manager. Or any corruptions, to be able to fix them through Enterprise Manager."
IBM InfoSphere Optim is ranked 17th in Database Development and Management with 3 reviews while Oracle Enterprise Manager is ranked 1st in Database Development and Management with 123 reviews. IBM InfoSphere Optim is rated 6.6, while Oracle Enterprise Manager is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of IBM InfoSphere Optim writes "Can easily restore the database, but the cost needs to be reduced". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Enterprise Manager writes "Provides good stability and has an easy implementation process". IBM InfoSphere Optim is most compared with Solix Enterprise Data Management, Informatica Data Archive and Informatica Persistent Data Masking, whereas Oracle Enterprise Manager is most compared with Zabbix, Quest Spotlight, Dynatrace, AppDynamics and Quest Foglight for Databases. See our IBM InfoSphere Optim vs. Oracle Enterprise Manager report.
See our list of best Database Development and Management vendors.
We monitor all Database Development and Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
