We performed a comparison between IBM Maximo and JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It can be particularly useful for power line operations, enabling linemen in the field to gather information and send it across the country as well as different parts of the world."
"Preventive maintenance management."
"The most valuable features are the ability to create work orders and preventative maintenance."
"We are very thankful to have IBM integrated with our own Legacy cloud-based system"
"Reliable, very configurable, and it's all integrated in the same database."
"I have found Work Order management the most valuable feature. Additionally, it is a very robust and powerful solution."
"The most valuable feature is the ability to correct maintenance."
"IBM Maximo is the best software for assets management."
"The documentation of the solution needs to be improved. It would be helpful. Additionally, more analytics would."
"The most demonstrable feature is the asset creation form, which is quite informative."
"The product enables us to track our assets."
"The initial setup is straightforward."
More JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management Pros →
"Coding can be complex when customization is required."
"On a scale of one to ten, where ten is easy and one is difficult, I rate the setup process a two since it is very complicated."
"Initial setup is a longer process because Maximo is bigger and has more processes."
"Vendor management needs enhancement."
"Although you can create notifications with Maximo, the configuration and options could be improved."
"There are always ways to improve and make things better."
"The pricing model of the solution has room for improvement as well as the after-sales support."
"It was very slow due to the lagging issues. So that was kind of frustrating, considering how slow it was while functioning."
"The solution’s depreciation calculation setup needs to be improved because it is slightly disintegrated."
"The product must improve the approval process of asset transfer and disposal."
"The UI and UX need severe improvements."
"The documentation of the solution needs to be improved. It would be helpful. Additionally, more analytics would."
More JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management Cons →
More JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
IBM Maximo is ranked 1st in Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) with 23 reviews while JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management is ranked 6th in Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) with 4 reviews. IBM Maximo is rated 8.0, while JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of IBM Maximo writes "Work order management and scalability enables the businesses' needs to be met". On the other hand, the top reviewer of JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management writes "The product is reasonably priced and easy to set up, but the UI and UX need severe improvements". IBM Maximo is most compared with ServiceNow, JIRA Service Management, ABB Ability Asset Suite EAM, IFS Cloud Platform and Corrigo Enterprise, whereas JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management is most compared with . See our IBM Maximo vs. JD Edwards EnterpriseOne Asset Lifecycle Management report.
See our list of best Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.