We performed a comparison between Incredibuild and Jenkins based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about GitLab, Jenkins, Amazon Web Services (AWS) and others in Build Automation."It is saving time for developers, which is saving money for the company."
"The initial setup is simple."
"Having builds and test tasks triggered on commit helps not to break the product."
"Jenkins is very easy to use."
"We really appreciate that this solution is plug and play. When coding in the version control system, this product completes the build process automatically."
"The most valuable aspect of Jenkins is pipeline customization. Jenkins provides a declarative pipeline as well as a scripted pipeline. The scripted pipeline uses a programming language. You can customize it to your needs, so we use Jenkins because other solutions like Travis and Spinnaker don't allow much customization."
"The most valuable features of Jenkins are its ease of use and good plugins available. You are able to connect to a lot of solutions."
"Jenkins integrates with multiple tools like Bitbucket and makes life easier. We don't have to write a lot of code since a lot of libraries are available."
"The most valuable features are Jenkins Pipelines for ALM and full Deploy Cycle."
"Stability could be improved. I don't know the reason for the instability because there are no logs that help me to understand the problem."
"The UI must be more user-friendly."
"Jenkins is an open-source solution, and people tend to stay on the same version for a long time. When you look for an answer on Google, you often find something that doesn't relate to your implementation. The plugins are both the aspect of Jenkins and also one of the worst because the plugins can have different versions, so it's hard to figure out how to solve the problems."
"The product should provide more visualization as to how many pipelines are performing and how many builds are happening. It should also integrate with Kubernetes and OpenShift."
"Jenkins could improve by allowing more scripting languages. We need to use Groovy scripting and it is difficult to debug and it is not ideal for creating file scripts. We tried to search for assistance but we did not find much help."
"Better and easy-to-use integration with Docker would be an improvement."
"There is no way for the cloud repositories to trigger Jenkins."
"Support should be provided at no cost, as there is no free support available for any of the free versions."
"Jenkins needs a faster deployment process."
Earn 20 points
Incredibuild is ranked 20th in Build Automation while Jenkins is ranked 2nd in Build Automation with 83 reviews. Incredibuild is rated 8.0, while Jenkins is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Incredibuild writes "Saves time for developers, which saves money for the company". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Jenkins writes "A highly-scalable and stable solution that reduces deployment time and produces a significant return on investment". Incredibuild is most compared with Bazel, TeamCity and GitLab, whereas Jenkins is most compared with GitLab, Bamboo, AWS CodePipeline, IBM Rational Build Forge and Harness.
See our list of best Build Automation vendors.
We monitor all Build Automation reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.