We performed a comparison between Infor CloudSuite and Oracle Enterprise Asset Management based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about IBM, IFS, Infor and others in Enterprise Asset Management (EAM)."It is a complete wave management system to increase processing efficiency."
"The customization capabilities of CloudSuite Industrial are also there."
"From a product perspective, it's more lenient and suitable for using features in finance, such as reconciling our payments, accounts payable, accounts receivable, etc."
"The solution is particularly effective for ERP. The automation of emails is a valuable feature for me. The solution is stable. The solution is scalable. Infor CloudSuite Industrial is better for its development aspect. It allows us to customize and implement changes more efficiently. The initial setup was straightforward. I recommend the solution."
"Workflow management and collaboration tools enhance operations and facilitate seamless interaction among departments."
"Infor CloudSuite Industrial is easy to setup. The built-in solution is already there, so we can start implementing it right away when we install it in an organization. After going through different test executions and workshops, any missing features can be added using Infor extension tables and other products. It will take at least eight to nine months to go live."
"Infor's environment—ION and Infor OS—is better than SAP's. The load time is shorter and Infor performs much better than SAP."
"It is a scalable solution."
"The whole product is important and valuable to us."
"Infor needs to work on its documentation. For example, if I need to create a business object deployment from LVN to element, the instructions for this are insufficient. Many specific use cases aren't covered in the manual."
"There is room for improvement in the pricing. For us, it's the pricing aspect. Since we're South African, it's difficult when it's a dollar-based product."
"They could include marketing automation for the product."
"Currently, there are some challenges with handling large reports, possibly due to setup limits or issues with the solution."
"There should be better clarity and agreement on all interfaces and requirements before signing a contract. This would avoid unexpected costs and complications later on."
"The platform's distribution features need enhancement."
"Regarding integration, specific third-party tools are not accepted, for example, on the old version of IBM or Oracle."
"It takes time to properly learn what the product can do."
"The product is not user-friendly."
More Oracle Enterprise Asset Management Pricing and Cost Advice →
Infor CloudSuite is ranked 3rd in Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) with 13 reviews while Oracle Enterprise Asset Management is ranked 4th in Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) with 1 review. Infor CloudSuite is rated 8.0, while Oracle Enterprise Asset Management is rated 5.0. The top reviewer of Infor CloudSuite writes " Advanced forecasting and analysis capabilities". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Enterprise Asset Management writes "The product is not user-friendly, and it is very expensive, though it is highly stable". Infor CloudSuite is most compared with Infor LN, Infor M3, SAP Warehouse Management, IBM Maximo and Microsoft Dynamics 365 Business Central, whereas Oracle Enterprise Asset Management is most compared with IBM Maximo and ABB Ability Asset Suite EAM.
See our list of best Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) vendors.
We monitor all Enterprise Asset Management (EAM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
