We performed a comparison between Infor ION and Mule Anypoint Platform based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Business-to-Business Middleware solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The tool's most valuable feature is middleware capabilities."
"We haven't had any issues with ION so far."
"ION is good for building custom middleware boxes."
"I have found the most valuable feature to be the ability to monitor integration performance and the reasons for the failure of inbound and outbound transactions. We can see both inbound and outbound transactions, and it gives us a mirror image or the whole history of all inbound and outbound transactions between Infor M3 Business Engine and the third parties."
"The API toolkit is the solution's most valuable aspect at this time, for our organization."
"MuleSoft offers with the Anypoint Platform a unified platform for API management and an integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) as well as an on-premise Enterprise Service Bus pattern."
"The most valuable feature of Mule Anypoint Platform is rapid development."
"It is very easy to use for building connectors. It comes with a lot of connectors. For example, it has different adapters for NetSuite, which are very easy to use. It also has Salesforce connectors. The object store feature is also really easy to use. Mule Anypoint Platform is also good in terms of performance and how it is managed behind the scenes."
"API management."
"We are very satisfied with the DevOps support."
"The product is very user-friendly."
"The most valuable feature is the variety of characters Anypoint Platform has. It is very scalable and customizable."
"ION's integration with older applications could be better."
"Infor ION doesn't provide connectors for all integration touchpoints. Sometimes, we may have to build our own. It incurs additional costs for the customer."
"The dashboard is not very simple and can be a bit tricky."
"I would like to see ION add automated setup and integration with Salesforce. They need to work on these types of tools."
"Mule Anypoint Platform could improve by having more up-to-date adapters to do work in a digital space."
"Better documentation, in particular with respect to the initial setup, would be helpful."
"The compatibility with vendors can be improved. Microsoft Azure heavily uses single software."
"One area we'd like to see improvement in is the error logging and troubleshooting process."
"Price-wise, it is a good product since it is reasonably priced...Mule Anypoint Platform can get too complex for non-technical people."
"What I hear from my customers is that it's very expensive compared to the cost of other integration suites. The cost keeps increasing. MuleSoft should come up with customization factors by using a different way of getting the cost-related stuff to attract customers. That is, they should come up with some cost optimizations."
"The platform's data integration tools need improvement on the processing side."
"It doesn't work well when you try using it for the processing layer."
Infor ION is ranked 8th in Business-to-Business Middleware with 4 reviews while Mule Anypoint Platform is ranked 2nd in Business-to-Business Middleware with 41 reviews. Infor ION is rated 8.6, while Mule Anypoint Platform is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Infor ION writes "It's bundled, so I don't need to purchase an additional product". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Mule Anypoint Platform writes "Robust, reliable, and stable, ensuring high availability for critical integrations". Infor ION is most compared with SAP Process Orchestration and BizTalk Server, whereas Mule Anypoint Platform is most compared with MuleSoft Composer, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, SAP Process Orchestration, Oracle Integration Cloud Service and Digibee. See our Infor ION vs. Mule Anypoint Platform report.
See our list of best Business-to-Business Middleware vendors.
We monitor all Business-to-Business Middleware reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.