We performed a comparison between Informatica Cloud Data Integration and SnapLogic based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution has the best feature for parameterization."
"It has all the advantages of the Cloud in that you can use it without worrying about infrastructure, upkeep, or upgrades."
"It is a scalable solution. Scalability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten."
"The Mapping Configuration and PowerCenter wizards are valuable. We use them to run our business logic."
"Informatica Cloud Data Integration is stable."
"The Mapping Designer allows for declarative ETL development (visual scripting) that leverages a wide array of different transformations."
"The serverless capability and the packaging application of the solution are valuable."
"I like the fact that you can find almost any product connection that you need and the list is always expanding."
"By using snaps instead of functions in code, you can see the building blocks of the integration visually. This helps a lot."
"SnapLogice is a low-code development tool."
"The connection with SOAP is the best feature."
"The API architecture makes it easy for orchestration."
"SnapLogic is an IPA tool that leverages a low code environment to connect to multiple sources, extract data, and store it in Azure data lake."
"The feature I found most valuable in SnapLogic is low-code development. Low-code development has been very useful for simple processes, which is required for business users such as extracting details from a file or getting things reported by calling your web service. Calling your web service also becomes easier with SnapLogic because of the snaps available, so if you have the documentation, you can call an API. You don't have to write all those clients to call an API, so that is another feature I found very easy in SnapLogic. Configuring and managing all the file systems also become very handy with the solution."
"What I found most valuable in SnapLogic is the ETL feature, particularly the Transform Snap Pack, for example, any kind of reading or writing on Transform Snaps. Other than that, all the third-party connectivity tools such as the SAP Snap Pack, Salesforce Snap Pack, Workday Snap Pack, even the ServiceNow Snap Pack, I find all those are pretty useful in SnapLogic."
"The solution is easy to implement and easy to use. It's basically just drag and drop."
"We would like to have accessibility to the repository."
"A general improvement in icons and the virtual interface would be good."
"The error information provided is not informative, as compared to Power Center."
"Certain shortcomings in the product's UI make it an area where improvements are required."
"There are a small number of UI bugs that occur on occasion."
"The regions in which the data resides are still limited. This could be an issue in terms of the data residency laws of some of the countries. They should get more regions."
"It would be helpful if there was a GenAI feature integrated into the system, especially regarding the data quality."
"The price modeling could be more flexible."
"The dashboards regarding scheduled tasks need further improvement."
"The support is the most important improvement they could make."
"I would like to see more performance-related dashboards, ones that display the cost of a pipeline, for instance. Also, it would be helpful to have management dashboards for overseeing pipelines and connections."
"SnapLogic should have some inbuilt protocol mechanism in order to speed up."
"I don't think the support has better knowledge about technologies and tool support. There were lots of times when we had an issue, and it took me quite a long time to explain the problem. I feel like some of the support staff don't know their product well."
"They should expand in terms of features for SaaS-based market requirements in different sectors."
"SnapLogic sits somewhere in the middle. It doesn’t offer enough easy canned integrations for its users like some of the easier to use integration apps."
"The problem is that SnapLogic doesn't offer a wide variety of connectors. For example, integrating with Salesforce is not that easy."
More Informatica Cloud Data Integration Pricing and Cost Advice →
Informatica Cloud Data Integration is ranked 5th in Cloud Data Integration with 40 reviews while SnapLogic is ranked 7th in Cloud Data Integration with 21 reviews. Informatica Cloud Data Integration is rated 7.8, while SnapLogic is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Informatica Cloud Data Integration writes "A stable, scalable, and user-friendly solution". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SnapLogic writes "Easy to set up, easy to use, and is low-code". Informatica Cloud Data Integration is most compared with Informatica PowerCenter, Azure Data Factory, AWS Glue, Fivetran and SAP Data Services, whereas SnapLogic is most compared with IBM InfoSphere DataStage, AWS Glue, Azure Data Factory, SSIS and Alteryx Designer. See our Informatica Cloud Data Integration vs. SnapLogic report.
See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.