We performed a comparison between ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus and Tenable Security Center based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Tenable, Wiz, SentinelOne and others in Vulnerability Management."The solution helps us figure out vulnerabilities and fix them."
"The solution is one of the most, if not the most, stable product available."
"We really love the Security Center dashboard. It basically performs vulnerability scanning and then outputs a vulnerability data."
"The most valuable features of Tenable SC are the reports and the dashboards."
"The usability is really good. It's very easy to use and a good platform. It is scalable and very stable. The technical support is fine and the setup is super easy."
"The product is our second solution, and we are happy that it meets our requirements."
"Tenable is the leading product for vulnerability scanning."
"The most valuable features in Tenable SC are scanning and analysis."
"The predictive prioritization features are pretty good. They do a lot of research and we trust the research that they do internally. They have knowledge of what's going on with many companies, where we only get a view into what's going on here. So the ability to get best practices out of them as part of this solution, is valuable to us."
"The user interface is the only drawback of the product."
"The solution should provide better web application features and support."
"The pricing is reasonable, but this could be brought down more aggressively, such as we see with Rapid7, Tenable SC's main competitor."
"We would like to see the inclusion of external IPs and simplified reporting that's easier to deal with"
"A good plugin editor would be a good additional option for the Security Center."
"Additional costs are associated with using the solution, as additional scanners are required for different endpoints connected to the Tenable Security Center. If Tenable Security Center could extract information from these scanners automatically rather than manually, it would enhance user-friendliness for customers."
"If I want to have a very low-managed scan policy, it's a lot of work to create something which is very basic. If I use a tool like Nmap, all I have to do is download it, install it, type in the command, and it's good to go. In Security Center, I have to go through a lot of work to create a policy that's very basic."
"The web application is not very functional."
"The solution needs to improve its support. I would like to see a bird's eye view of my network architecture. I would also like to see the continuous view feature in the tool."
More ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus Pricing and Cost Advice →
ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus is ranked 21st in Vulnerability Management with 1 review while Tenable Security Center is ranked 1st in Vulnerability Management with 48 reviews. ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus is rated 9.0, while Tenable Security Center is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus writes "Helps find vulnerabilities, reduces response time to critical vulnerabilities, and reduces false alerts". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Tenable Security Center writes "A security solution for vulnerability assessment with automated scans". ManageEngine Vulnerability Manager Plus is most compared with Tenable Nessus and Qualys VMDR, whereas Tenable Security Center is most compared with Tenable Vulnerability Management, Qualys VMDR, Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable Nessus and Horizon3.ai.
See our list of best Vulnerability Management vendors.
We monitor all Vulnerability Management reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.