We performed a comparison between Microsoft Azure and Oracle Enterprise Manager based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about Microsoft, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Oracle and others in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS)."The most valuable feature of Microsoft Azure is that it is easy to use."
"Kubernetes service and API management are the most valuable."
"One advantage of using Azure is that clients can start with a low-cost entry in terms of hardware and scale as their business and user base grows. They don't need to allocate a large budget for infrastructure upfront."
"It's very easy to build a new service and get it into production."
"The most valuable features of the solution are for management, such as dashboards."
"Feedback and error messages make much more sense in Azure than in AWS."
"The solution has proven to be quite stable so far."
"Azure is very flexible."
"Oracle Enterprise Manager triggers critical alerts."
"The 13cR2 updates to the OEM family, strongly integrate Cloud (off-site, hybrid and on-premise) services providing a seamless way to see all of your resources regardless of where they are deployed."
"The most valuable feature is the monitoring because it's very useful for checking and troubleshooting compared with other products, like Nagios for example, that have some interaction with Oracle."
"This solution allows us to quickly drill down when there are issues."
"We use Oracle Enterprise Manager as a tool to monitor Oracle products."
"We use Oracle Enterprise Manager for a lot of services like ERP and PLM."
"What I like most about Oracle Enterprise Manager are its features, particularly the active session history. It provides insights into SQL, and I use it regularly to identify potential issues."
"I have found the singular GUI feature very helpful. Fewer DBA resources can be allocated with Toad licenses."
"Integration with more platforms needs improvement."
"A problem with Azure is that the architecture that they have is not really compliant — not really connecting with the endpoint Cloud."
"The license price could be lower."
"I would like to see improved migration tools. It is improving week by week. They just need to make sure that they keep up with the new functionality provided in other clouds."
"The cost calculation for the services can be an unclear aspect which makes it difficult to estimate the expenses incurred accurately."
"The security feature in the solution is an area that needs to be improved."
"The solution needs to offer more data analysis services."
"The solution needs a more integrated password feature."
"The solution’s pricing could be improved."
"The tool's pricing is costly."
"There's a lot of documentation to go through as a new user."
"My opinion is that this solution needs to improve consolidation. That is what our business needs the most right now."
"I feel more dashboards can be added, especially those useful to higher levels of IT management."
"Technical support could be more responsive."
"The product must improve its support team."
"I rate Oracle Enterprise Manager six out of 10 for affordability. It's expensive."
Microsoft Azure is ranked 1st in Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) with 299 reviews while Oracle Enterprise Manager is ranked 1st in Database Development and Management with 123 reviews. Microsoft Azure is rated 8.4, while Oracle Enterprise Manager is rated 8.4. The top reviewer of Microsoft Azure writes "Promotes clear, logical structures preventing impractical configurations and offers seamless integration ". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Enterprise Manager writes "Provides good stability and has an easy implementation process". Microsoft Azure is most compared with Google Firebase, Amazon AWS, Oracle Cloud Infrastructure (OCI), Alibaba Cloud and Pivotal Cloud Foundry, whereas Oracle Enterprise Manager is most compared with Zabbix, Quest Spotlight, Dynatrace, AppDynamics and EDB Postgres Enterprise Manager.
We monitor all Infrastructure as a Service Clouds (IaaS) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.