We performed a comparison between Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse and SAP NetWeaver Business Warehouse based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Data Warehouse solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The most valuable feature is the business intelligence (BI) part of it."
"It has allowed fast daily loads and analysis of millions of rows of data, which eventually moved to near real-time."
"The most valuable feature for me is querying."
"Data collection and reporting are valuable features of the solution."
"The solution's integration is good."
"I am very satisfied with the customer service/technical support."
"Tools like the BI and SAS are excellent."
"We can store the data in a data lake for a very low cost."
"Data modeling is a valuable feature."
"It provides us with proof of data, we can centralize all of the information, check it, and then provide the information to our users."
"It is a robust system."
"Transformation is a valuable feature of SAP NetWeaver. I can transform the data as per my needs or my client's needs. For example, flat tables can be transformed with respect to our requirements to combine multiple modules into one single table, and we can derive analytics."
"It's an excellent over-all tool for managers to analyze their business."
"A robust and efficient product."
"The security and audit procedures are the most valuable features."
"The product must provide more frequent updates."
"The solution is expensive and has room for improvement."
"I would like the ability to do more real-time type updates instead of batch-oriented updates."
"If the database is large with a lot of columns then it is difficult to clean the data."
"It could offer more development across the solution."
"It needs more compatibility with common BI tools."
"We find the cost of the solution to be a little high."
"We'd like to see it be a bit more compatible with other solutions."
"It is difficult when your native language is not English. It is difficult for us to explain our issue and also difficult for the technical team to explain a resolution to us."
"Design and modeling could be simplified."
"There are performance issues in terms of scalability and availability."
"The product could provide more features."
"I think more integration with other applications would be perfect."
"The program is difficult to learn to use"
"Connectors are complex, and it is difficult to understand or know which connector should be used. For instance, if I want to connect APIs, I will not be able to do it directly. I would have to go to the portal integration to get the data. Therefore, having simplified connectors will make things much easier."
More Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse Pricing and Cost Advice →
More SAP NetWeaver Business Warehouse Pricing and Cost Advice →
Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse is ranked 9th in Data Warehouse with 32 reviews while SAP NetWeaver Business Warehouse is ranked 15th in Data Warehouse with 9 reviews. Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse is rated 7.6, while SAP NetWeaver Business Warehouse is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse writes "An easy to setup tool that allows its users to write stored procedure, making it a scalable product". On the other hand, the top reviewer of SAP NetWeaver Business Warehouse writes "Powerful solution with good security and audit procedure features". Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse is most compared with Microsoft Azure Synapse Analytics, Oracle Exadata, SAP BW4HANA and Snowflake, whereas SAP NetWeaver Business Warehouse is most compared with SAP BW4HANA and SAP Business Warehouse. See our Microsoft Parallel Data Warehouse vs. SAP NetWeaver Business Warehouse report.
See our list of best Data Warehouse vendors.
We monitor all Data Warehouse reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.