We performed a comparison between Mule Anypoint Platform and OpenText Trading Grid based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out what your peers are saying about SAP, MuleSoft, IBM and others in Business-to-Business Middleware."The integration potential is excellent."
"This is a good platform for designing, flowing out APIs, and then doing API-based integrations."
"MuleSoft offers with the Anypoint Platform a unified platform for API management and an integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) as well as an on-premise Enterprise Service Bus pattern."
"The community manager is the standout feature of the Mule Anypoint Platform, as it provides a platform to showcase your API to external parties. It is exceptionally user-friendly and enables external parties to easily utilize and consume the APIs."
"Mule Anypoint Platform's valuable features are its flexibility in terms of deployment and its SaaS capabilities."
"Mule works very well with Salesforce and CRMs."
"The most valuable feature of Mule Anypoint Platform is rapid development."
"The most valuable feature is the variety of characters Anypoint Platform has. It is very scalable and customizable."
"The solution is easy to implement."
"The solution's pricing model is very strange, and it will be really expensive if you use APIs a lot."
"The compatibility with vendors can be improved. Microsoft Azure heavily uses single software."
"Adding connectors for new upcoming applications would add extra value to this product."
"Pricing is one aspect of the solution that is troublesome. It's too expensive for smaller organizations."
"I would like to see some data integration and automation."
"The platform's data integration tools need improvement on the processing side."
"In order to set up a storefront, we currently rely on a third-party solution. It would greatly enhance our operations if this feature was integrated into their existing solution."
"Code quality, Code Security, SaaS, and DaaS security, can all be improved."
"Technical support needs to be better."
Mule Anypoint Platform is ranked 2nd in Business-to-Business Middleware with 41 reviews while OpenText Trading Grid is ranked 10th in Business-to-Business Middleware with 1 review. Mule Anypoint Platform is rated 8.2, while OpenText Trading Grid is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Mule Anypoint Platform writes "Robust, reliable, and stable, ensuring high availability for critical integrations". On the other hand, the top reviewer of OpenText Trading Grid writes "Industry-leading, easy to implement, and has good mapping specification guidelines". Mule Anypoint Platform is most compared with MuleSoft Composer, Microsoft Azure Logic Apps, SAP Process Orchestration, Oracle Integration Cloud Service and SAP Cloud Platform, whereas OpenText Trading Grid is most compared with IBM Sterling B2B Integration Services, TrueCommerce EDI, SEEBURGER Business Integration Suite, SPS Commerce Fulfillment (EDI) and SAP Cloud Platform.
See our list of best Business-to-Business Middleware vendors, best Cloud Data Integration vendors, and best Integration Platform as a Service (iPaaS) vendors.
We monitor all Business-to-Business Middleware reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.