We performed a comparison between Nutanix Disaster Recovery and VMware SRM based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Disaster Recovery (DR) Software solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Nutanix Disaster Recovery needs to have a feature that can automate manual tasks."
"The most valuable feature of Nutanix Disaster Recovery is the reliability and scalability of being able to swing our workloads across the country."
"The product is very simple and very easy to use."
"Nutanix Disaster Recovery can be used for snapshots, backup, and disaster recovery."
"The solution can be deployed in a couple of hours."
"In terms of resiliency, the most valuable aspect of SRM has been its effectiveness."
"The UI is very user-friendly and testing is easy."
"VMware SRM is a very nice tool for disaster recovery for virtual environments."
"The replication is the solution's most valuable feature. If we have some issues on the VM in the main site we can migrate it to another site automatically."
"The solution helps to improve business continuity processes. Its automatic failover and failback policies have been wonderful."
"It has a good and effective user interface."
"The most valuable feature is the integration with our Nutanix environment."
"The solution's bandwidth utilization can be improved further."
"Nutanix Disaster Recovery needs to have a feature that can automate manual tasks."
"The solution should include a standard license for the object level and file level."
"The product must allow users to create a production domain on the main site in one hypervisor and a backup site on another."
"The biggest issue for us is that this product does not have any demo for customers."
"One thing which is lacking from the SRM is reporting."
"We would like the patching management function of this product to be improved."
"Lacks stability and as a result requires continuous monitoring."
"There needs to be better stability during heavy capacity in future releases."
"In general, the drawbacks of VMware SRM, where improvements can be made, stem from the fact that it is an expensive and complex product."
"This product is not appropriate for those moving to a broader cloud footprint."
"In my opinion, the integration with Peer Persistent Storage could be improved."
Nutanix Disaster Recovery is ranked 16th in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software with 4 reviews while VMware SRM is ranked 6th in Disaster Recovery (DR) Software with 73 reviews. Nutanix Disaster Recovery is rated 9.4, while VMware SRM is rated 8.0. The top reviewer of Nutanix Disaster Recovery writes "A reliable and scalable solution that can be used to ensure workloads are replicated when needed". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware SRM writes "A scalable solution that integrates well with the VMware platform, but its platform agnostics do not support on-cloud usage". Nutanix Disaster Recovery is most compared with Zerto, whereas VMware SRM is most compared with Veeam Backup & Replication, Zerto, Dell RecoverPoint for Virtual Machines, Azure Site Recovery and NAKIVO Backup & Replication. See our Nutanix Disaster Recovery vs. VMware SRM report.
See our list of best Disaster Recovery (DR) Software vendors.
We monitor all Disaster Recovery (DR) Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.