We performed a comparison between One Identity Manager and Oracle Identity Governance based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Identity Management (IM) solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.
"I'm not using Omada, but the interface is easy to use and gives you a solid overview of your identities."
"When we started with identity and access management, we cleaned up and skipped 500 accounts. Therefore, there are a lot of people who are still in our system. Using this tool, we have cleaned up a lot of accounts for ourselves as well as our partners and suppliers. So, we can manage everything now."
"The administrative features and SoD are valuable."
"The customer success and support teams have been crucial."
"The most valuable aspect of the product is that it is Microsoft-based and it supports all Microsoft technology."
"The support response time and the freedom from strange bugs and strange things happening in the software are valuable."
"Its best feature is definitely the process design. It is quite easy and straightforward to design a process."
"Omada's most valuable aspect is its usability."
"The IT shop is a great tool that allows a simple interface for users to see their access, be able to request additional access, and view the workflow approval process to understand where their request is and what any hold-ups may be."
"It's very flexible. You can customize it to the fullest extent. You can use it for almost every situation for every customer."
"The most valuable features of this solution are its handling and that it is easy to maintain and manage the data."
"The most valuable feature for me is the built-in security, which is the best that I have seen."
"We no longer keep users who shouldn't exist."
"I rate One Identity nine out of 10 for stability. We haven't seen any downtime. It has worked smoothly since it went into production."
"We have been able to make our help desk self-sufficient by giving them role-based access. We have been able to reduce service dependency by 40% to 50%."
"The Data Importer is a great tool to create an ETL. It generates code which is easy to maintain later without the tool."
"It has a very good response time."
"Identifying connector framework for unifying provisioning capabilities from OIM."
"Password management is a valuable feature."
"The most valuable feature of Oracle Identity Governance is user lifecycle management. Certification is also a valuable feature of the solution. Oracle Identity Governance allows you to assign who has access to what, which is its basic feature."
"OIM in my organization has improved its use and dependability, allowing us to pass audit each time."
"The most important features that have impacted our environment recently are the Single Sign-On solution, role based provisioning, and the automated provisioning of accounts to target systems."
"This solution has improved the organization in several ways, including saving many help-desk password-reset calls, IT staff productivity, and quicker user on-boarding."
"The support service of Oracle is good. We use it a lot and their response is quick."
"The security permission inside Omada needs improvement. It's tricky to set up."
"If you find an error and you need it fixed, you have to upgrade. It's not like they say, "Okay, we'll fix this problem for you." You have to upgrade. The last time we upgraded, because there was an error in a previous version, we had to pay 150,000 Danish Krone (about $24,000 at the time of this review) to upgrade our systems... That means that we have to pay to get errors fixed that Omada has made in programming the system. I hope they change this way of looking at things."
"When making a process, you should be able to use some coding to do some advanced calculations. The calculations you can currently do are too basic. I would also like some additional script features."
"Omada's reporting functionality is limited and could benefit from greater customization."
"The architecture of the entire system should also be less complex. The way they process the data is complex."
"When the re-certification process is launched that makes Omada very slow. There are performance issues in the current version."
"What I would most like to see added to the product is role management, especially enterprise or business role management, and the processes around that."
"There is room for improvement in Omada's integration capabilities, particularly in streamlining complex integrations and enhancing programming logic for better rule management."
"The web portal can be a bit muggy at times. This is one of the key complaints from our customers."
"We would like the product to integrate with ServiceNow, since One Identity Manager and ServiceNow are two of our better tools."
"The initial setup was complex. It is an extremely complicated thing to replace an entire self-built solution."
"One of the things we would like is the ability to have more than one system role manager. That would be nice. For example, when people are on vacation, sometimes it gets a little hard to administrate system roles."
"I would like One Identity Manager to offer an easier way for users to learn to use their new features."
"There are a few aspects of One Identity Manager's user experience that could be improved."
"It’s not something you get from the beginning. It’s not like Windows. It is more complicated. You need to know a few things from the back end, however, as you learn it, it becomes easy."
"We fell into that trap of over-customization which made upgrading the product difficult."
"I have yet to see its full functionality exercised in my organization."
"Simplify & add more functionality to Identity Cloud Service (IDCS)."
"It responds fast but because of the bugs we have already had some major incidents and complete unavailability."
"Identity Governance is a difficult tool to work with. You have to input many models to understand what is happening with the logins. The user interface is not so good. And a lot of the features we use aren't available out of the box."
"The solution needs to improve its web interface in the next release."
"An area for improvement in Oracle Identity Governance is that it isn't refreshed or updated as much. The only area that changed on it in the last five years was the GUI. The solution still has the same installation, troubleshooting, and configuration. Oracle Identity Governance is still very complicated when compared to other solutions. It seems that Oracle doesn't focus too much on Oracle Identity Governance in terms of making some improvements to it."
"This product currently uses a complex and old implementation. They need a single, user-friendly console for easy configuration. The Active Directory Services (ADS) integration needs improvement. They should offer non-Java coding options and simplify mapping."
"The cost of this product needs to be reduced."
One Identity Manager is ranked 3rd in Identity Management (IM) with 77 reviews while Oracle Identity Governance is ranked 10th in Identity Management (IM) with 66 reviews. One Identity Manager is rated 8.0, while Oracle Identity Governance is rated 7.4. The top reviewer of One Identity Manager writes "The JML is customizable but the support team isn't strong". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Oracle Identity Governance writes "A scalable solution designed to meet the requirements of medium and large-sized companies". One Identity Manager is most compared with SailPoint Identity Security Cloud, EVOLVEUM midPoint, Cisco ISE (Identity Services Engine), ForgeRock and Saviynt, whereas Oracle Identity Governance is most compared with SailPoint Identity Security Cloud, CyberArk Privileged Access Manager, Saviynt, Microsoft Identity Manager and ForgeRock. See our One Identity Manager vs. Oracle Identity Governance report.
See our list of best Identity Management (IM) vendors and best User Provisioning Software vendors.
We monitor all Identity Management (IM) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
